What is OmniNerd?

Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.

Submit New Content

Voting Booth

I am most afraid of dying?

62 votes, 9 comments
2
Nerd-Its
+ -

TEMPEST Attack on LCD

Newspaper current event by VnutZ on 30 April 2007, tagged as computing

In movies, surveillance is depicted as a few spooks sitting in an unmarked utility van sipping coffee, allegedly peeking into every aspect of a target's life. It sounds far fetched and unbelievable, but TEMPEST attacks represent a real world electronic surveillance technique dating back to the 1950s. Every electronic device emits RF (radio frequency) noise unless properly shielded. TEMPEST is simply the science of using antennas and detectors coupled with advanced reconstruction techniques to determine what those signals represent.

Previously, TEMPEST attacks saw great success against high RF targets like CRT computer monitors. Analysts could piece together the signals from the ray tube coils and remotely reconstruct what appeared on the screen. At the time, LCD monitors were thought to be more troublesome for TEMPEST detection owing to their reduced emissions. Security researcher Markus Kuhn recently shattered that illusion using refined TEMPEST techniques to remotely reconstruct an LCD image by analyzing signals leaking from the video cable. Proper shielding will restore security from such RF exposure. However, in a 2002 IEEE paper, Markus Kuhn demonstrated the reconstruction of a remote display's contents using nothing more than the ambient reflections of light on a wall (PDF).

Star This to Save in Your Profile Favorite
Thread parent sort order:
Highest Voted : Lowest Voted : Oldest : Newest
Thread verbosity:
Expand All : Minimize Replies to Comments
0 Nerd-Its - +
TEMPEST vs Direct Observation by VnutZ :: NR8

I'm actually amazed that despite all the network security and hoopla regarding IT these days that basic physical security is not more prominent. I can just gaze out our office building's windows and peer into ... easily 100+ different offices in Times Square. A pair of binoculars or a spotting scope is all that is necessary to read the monitor or the physical documents of those across the street.

Perhaps such corporate espionage is more rampant than I know thus far. But it does strike me as ridiculously easy. I'm sure the government snoops feel the same way. They have all kinds of cool and powerful tools ... but most of the time they're probably not even necessary.