Today products from China are literally everywhere. It was not always so, however. In 1973 trade between the U.S. and China was negligible. But perhaps China had something to offer. During discussions with then US National Security Advisor, Henry Kissinger, Mao Zedong, leader of communist China, offered (in jest) to send 10 million Chinese women to America, complaining that Chinese ladies were too fertile and threatened the country with demographic disaster. He also lamented that Chinese women were not ready to fight the Russians. At the end of the meeting, deciding Mao's comments would anger the public, both men agreed to censor the comments from the official record. Mao's comments about women are only now made available from recently released U.S. state department documents. Interestingly, though Mao never did send his bevy of Chinese women to America, U.S. families adopt thousands of Chinese children every year, 95% of whom are girls. In 1979 China instituted the one-child policy. Though undertaken to ease the strain of overpopulation, the practical effect of China's birth control plan has been to create a situation in which China by 2020 will have 30 million more men than women, an issue of potential social instability.



current event
by 
Add a Comment (1)
Email This
Message Author
RSS


Gender mismatch NOT a long-term problem by Anonymous :: NR0 :: on 18 February 2008
I've heard this sort of thing before - everybody worries about the day when 100% of the society becomes male (or female, depending on the particular situation).
It doesn't seem very likely, however: well before the 'minority' gender disappears completely, it will become VERY valuable (as is common with any scarce resource). If the number of women drops below a certain point, something like 'dowrys' might make a comback, with hordes of men offering large sums of money to families, in order that they might marry the daughter. At this point having your one child be a daughter, who will ultimately bring in a LOT of money, starts to seem like an attractive option. Far more valuable than sons, who are a dime a dozen and who (given the imbalance) are unlikely to have the opportunity to carry on your genes anyway.
Poof, problem solved!