An interesting (or perhaps humorous) article, "Microsoft's Virtual Server 2005", tests the OS giant's recent release of Virtual Server 2005. The author states that one of the pro's of the virtual server platform is its stability, yet he fails to consider the stability of the host platform. Perhaps the company who actually developed the product, Connectix, has become the new forerunner in host-independent stability. The author also states as one of the cons that the virtualization software only operates on Windows platforms and only runs virtual Windows server. Is he implying that running Windows on Windows is a bad idea?!"




Add a Comment (6)
Email This
Message Author
Statistics
RSS


Could someone school me? by markmcb :: NR7 :: Show
I'm not up to speed on virtual servers. Why would you want to do something like this? Wouldn't the server be much more efficient if it wasn't virtual? It just seems like you'd loose a lot of performance that you would want to see in a server.
Windows running Windows... what will they think of next?