What is OmniNerd?

Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.

Submit New Content

Voting Booth

Given only these non-healthy options, which single serving drink is healthiest?

72 votes, 16 comments
0
Nerd-Its
+ -

Black Holes May Not Exist

Newspaper current event by LordDilly on 26 June 2007, tagged as space

A new mathematical calculation may dramatically change the current scientific understanding of black holes: they don't exist. At least according to what Case Western Reserve University physicists Tanmay Vachaspati, Dejan Stojkovic and Lawrence M. Krauss have proposed after using a mathematical approach called a functional Schrodinger equation, which allows them to predict what a distant observer would see as a sphere of matter collapses. Their results say that the gravity of a collapsing star will generate non-thermal "pre-Hawking" radiation that reduces the mass-energy of the collapsing body, preventing it from ever becoming dense enough to form an event horizon and a true black hole. Vachaspati told New Scientist Space, "There are only stars going toward being a black hole but not getting there."

Astronomer Kimberly Weaver of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland is skeptical, saying, "we have never observed any events that would back this up." Nobel laureate Gerard 't Hooft of Utrecht University in the Netherlands also disagrees with the Case team's findings. "The process [the Case team] describes can in no way produce enough radiation to make a black hole disappear as quickly as he is suggesting," as the horizon forms before the black hole can evaporate.

Star This to Save in Your Profile Favorite
Thread parent sort order:
Highest Voted : Lowest Voted : Oldest : Newest
Thread verbosity:
Expand All : Minimize Replies to Comments
0 Nerd-Its - +
truth by Anonymous :: NR0

The article is very interesting. I am very sad to see that prominent scientists, including Nobel laureates like 't Hooft, give such statements without even reading the paper. If they read the paper, they would not have given such comments.