Login or Register

Forgot?
I'm new, register me!

What is OmniNerd?

100% of OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. OmniNerd allows content of all sorts and highlights the nerdiest of what's around.

Want to know more? Check out our welcome page, or simply register and have a first-hand look.

Submit New Content

Voting Booth

Been a victim of a violent crime?

60 votes, 4 comments
8
Nerd-Its
+ -

Academic Study of Rediscovered Ancient Koran Manuscripts Cause Controversy

Newspaper current event by LordDilly on 16 January 2008, tagged as koran, theology, and islam

The Koran is the holy book of Islam, the direct word of Allah as spoken through the Angel Gabriel to Muhammad. Unlike the variations and translations of the Bible, the Koran exists today in the exact same wording and format as when it was first recorded by the third Caliph nearly fourteen centuries ago. Or so everyone believes.

Until recently, some of the oldest variations of the Koran were paper fragments discovered during a Mosque restoration in Sana'a, Yemen. When the thousands of fragments were studied it was learned that not only did some date back as far as the 7th century, but many of them did not match to the modern version of the Koran. The Sana'a fragments stirred controversy in the 1980s when a German expert in Arabic calligraphy and Koranic paleography began studying them. "They don't want it made public that there is work being done at all, since the Muslim position is that everything that needs to be said about the Koran's history was said a thousand years ago," said Gerd-R. Puin. "These manuscripts say that the early history of the Koranic text is much more of an open question than many have suspected: the text was less stable, and therefore had less authority, than has always been claimed."

Other scholars that posed similar hypothesis had fatwas declared against them or declared apostates. Without additional evidence, scholars were reluctant to pursue the matter even though Puin's work had seeded doubt that the modern Koran was an exact version of Allah's word as spoken to Muhammad. That is, until another set of records that also depict ancient versions of the Koran surfaced.

As the story goes, the Bavarian Academy of Science was bombed April 24, 1944 and amongst the many artifacts lost was a photographic archive of ancient Koran pages. That is the story Anton Spitaler, an Arabic scholar of the academy, held onto for more than sixty years. The photographs were taken on a Leica in the 1930s by Gotthelf Bergsträsser and Otto Pretzl who set out on a quest to find the oldest copies of the Koran in the Middle East, Europe and Africa. After Spitaler's death, more than 250 rolls of film surfaced revealing texts from private libraries and holy mosques. Renowned scholar Angelika Neuwirth looks forward to using the photographs to continue the work she and others like Puin have difficulty pursuing due to complaints from the community: "Please ensure that these scholars are not given further access to the documents."

Favorite
[Show/Hide] [Reply]   3 Nerd-Its - + Favorite
Won't Change Anything by VnutZ :: NR8 :: on 16 January 2008

I seriously doubt this will change anything. Let's say it's actually proven that the Koran has changed over time from the original version. In theory this should not impact the belief at all as the foundational beliefs of Islam will remain the same. The educated will see exactly that and continue on their merry way. The uneducated, illiterate masses however might be shaken on the idea that the rock of their faith is based on an untruth. But they'll never know because their Imams won't tell them.

Again, it's a case where history repeats itself. Christianity dealt with the same thing in the middle ages where the religion's growth and foundation was based on a small, elite power base taking advantage of the poor, uneducated wretches at the bottom of the food chain. And history will repeat itself again such that even though the basics of Christianity are based on "and the fish was THIS BIG" elaborations of a truth along with addendums introduced by popes and emperors needing to wipe out pagans ... people still believe.

So as I said in the beginning, it's not going to "change" anything except make a small group question their faith, make a large group simply accept it and allow a larger group to continue in ignorance. Unfortunately, on the extreme side, it will be viewed as a western attack and an attempt to undermine the culture fueling more hatred. As long as that group stays small and doesn't grow larger ....

[Show/Hide] [Reply]   2 Nerd-Its - + Favorite
RE: Won't Change Anything by scottb :: NR7 :: on 16 January 2008

I'm not so sure. Remember that the bible texts were gathered together and the canon was only gradually established. It seems likely that the Synods that voted on the canon were aware that the texts they had were copies of copies, and that the relative importance of them wasn't necessarily known to the copyists.

Islam, however, has this basic belief that the importance of their scripture was instantly recognized and they've been preserved perfectly since they were first written. I imagine that helps provide significant support for literalist interpretations. Introducing that little wedge of doubt could really be the tipping point for Islam to develop a more meaningful group "moderate" believers to help balance out the fundamentalists.

[Show/Hide] [Reply]   1 Nerd-It - + Favorite
RE: Won't Change Anything by Anonymous :: NR0 :: on 12 April 2008

Maybe won't change anything soon, but sooner or later- probably later by a good degree- this will get out. But of course the same can be said for all texts about anything historical or otherwise, and peopel's views do change given time. If only we had a stable, bounded, absolute truth we knew has never and will never change. But we live on Earth, right?

[Show/Hide] [Reply]   1 Nerd-It - + Favorite
RE: Won't Change Anything by scottb :: NR7 :: on 18 April 2008

If only we had a stable, bounded, absolute truth we knew has never and will never change. But we live on Earth, right?

But this is exactly the problem. Many Muslims believe that they do have a "stable, bounded, absolute truth [that] has never and will never change". Many Christians believe the same nonsense about their scriptures. The belief is much less prevalent among Christians, though, perhaps because it's been long recognized that they've been changed quite a bit already. Muslims have had little exposure to the idea that their scriptures aren't "stable, bounded, absolute ... and will never change". This can help.