<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <channel>
     <atom:link href="http://www.omninerd.com/feeds/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
      <title>scottb on OmniNerd</title>
      <link>http://www.omninerd.com</link>
      <description>All of the latest articles, news, blogs and comments from scottb on OmniNerd.com</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:02:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:02:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      <generator>OmniNerd Feed Generator</generator>
      <managingEditor>mark@omninerd.com (Mark McBride)</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>mark@omninerd.com (Mark McBride)</webMaster>
      <item>
         <title>Programming experience? - Poll</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/polls/Programming_experience</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/polls/Programming_experience</guid>
         <description>
         <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/polls/Programming_experience">Cast Your Vote</a> - Programming experience?&lt;br/&gt;
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=179&amp;content_type=Poll#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (15)</a>         </description>
         <author>scottb</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 03:58:40 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Science - Not So Sloppy - Article</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Science_Not_So_Sloppy</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Science_Not_So_Sloppy</guid>
         <description>
         <p>Recent <em>Wall Street Journal</em> coverage<sup class="footnote" id="fnr1"><a href="#fn1">1</a></sup> has revived interest in Dr. John Ioannidis&#8217; 2005 PLoS article, &quot;Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.&quot;<sup class="footnote" id="fnr2"><a href="#fn2">2</a></sup> Somehow, I missed it the first time around, but this time the paper got me to thinking. In short, I don&#8217;t buy his argument; I think the whole foundation is wrong.</p>
<h2>Background</h2>
<p>First, for those who haven&#8217;t read his paper, or don&#8217;t follow the math, let me outline what he&#8217;s saying.</p>This article  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Science_Not_So_Sloppy">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=111&amp;content_type=Article#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (4)</a>         </description>
         <author>scottb</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 05:11:33 -0700</pubDate>
            <category>research</category>
            <category>mathematics</category>
            <category>medical research</category>
            <category>probability</category>
            <category>significance</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Best zombie flick? - Poll</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/polls/Best_zombie_flick</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/polls/Best_zombie_flick</guid>
         <description>
         <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/polls/Best_zombie_flick">Cast Your Vote</a> - Best zombie flick?&lt;br/&gt;
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=160&amp;content_type=Poll#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (14)</a>         </description>
         <author>scottb</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 08:53:00 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
