<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <channel>
     <atom:link href="http://www.omninerd.com/feeds/rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
      <title>Brandon on OmniNerd</title>
      <link>http://www.omninerd.com</link>
      <description>All of the latest articles, news, blogs and comments from Brandon on OmniNerd.com</description>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:58:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 10:58:33 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      <generator>OmniNerd Feed Generator</generator>
      <managingEditor>mark@omninerd.com (Mark McBride)</managingEditor>
      <webMaster>mark@omninerd.com (Mark McBride)</webMaster>
      <item>
         <title>Bottom-Up Tax Model - Article</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Bottom_Up_Tax_Model</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Bottom_Up_Tax_Model</guid>
         <description>
         <p>I&#8217;m in the middle of <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/The-Benefit-Burden-ebook/dp/B005LJEVDM">The Benefit and The Burden</a></em> (which is very interesting, albeit un-engaging and somewhat repetitive) and it has me thinking taxes. There&#8217;s so much standing in the way of fairness when the federal government raises revenue, and no matter where you try to fix things, someone gets burned.</p>
<p>While there are no doubt more impactful angles, as I put down my Kindle-via-iPhone in response to the fresh green light last week, I wondered if one of the problems isn&#8217;t the vast chasm between the individual and the Federal Government. The former pays the latter and expects the latter to serve &#8230; but the latter isn&#8217;t really configured to serve the former; it&#8217;s made to serve something in between (the States). The States, too, aren&#8217;t made to serve the individual, but the municipality &#8211; and there we finally reach the level positioned for the originally sought service.</p>This article  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Bottom_Up_Tax_Model">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=4205&amp;content_type=Article#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (2)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 23:09:17 -0800</pubDate>
            <category>taxes</category>
            <category>civic</category>
            <category>duty</category>
            <category>representation</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RE: Why not? - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35669</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35669</guid>
         <description>
         In the article "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/If_An_Assault_Rifle_Ban_Is_Passed">If An Assault Rifle Ban Is Passed?</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><p>I like the plan &#8230; because I know it&#8217;d die at step one.</p>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35669&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (1)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2013 20:07:29 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RE: The reason for 2x month payroll - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35411</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35411</guid>
         <description>
         In the article "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Paid_Twice_a_Month_vs_Every_Two_Weeks">Paid Twice a Month vs Every Two Weeks</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><p>Good point about the extra payroll each month. Didn&#8217;t think about that.</p>
<p>Also, I agree on the savings &#8230; But that isn&#8217;t my issue. (I have plenty of savings.) My problem is getting paid less because I happen to start working on a month with more days.</p>
<p>As for whining, I thought what I was doing was closer to &#8230; Well &#8230; Math. Maybe I missed something, though.</p>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35411&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (0)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:35:43 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RE: The tone of the article is a bit crazed - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35406</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35406</guid>
         <description>
         In the link "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/links/Reductionism_Dinner_Goes_to_Pieces">Reductionism: Dinner Goes to Pieces</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><div class="reply_quotation"><p>Ingesting a given amount of sucrose has exactly the same detrimental effects on the body as ingesting an equivalent molar mass of fructose.</p></div>
<p>You didn&#8217;t address my point: Rate of ingestion matters. Interaction with other ingested items matters. Workload of your liver matters.</p>
<p>Are you ignoring these complicating factors? Or do you really think there&#8217;s no interaction?</p>
<div class="reply_quotation"><p>You’re the one suggesting that the apple diet isn’t a metabolic disaster.</p></div>
<p>Yes, I am.</p>This comment  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/35406">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35406&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (1)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:50:52 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RE: The tone of the article is a bit crazed - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35403</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35403</guid>
         <description>
         In the link "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/links/Reductionism_Dinner_Goes_to_Pieces">Reductionism: Dinner Goes to Pieces</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><p>You keep using reductionism to argue this. I don&#8217;t accept that this is as simple as comparing fiber and sugar content. For example:</p>
<div class="reply_quotation"><p>The first step in the digestion of sucrose detaches the fructose and glucose molecules, after which you get all the metabolic effects of an equivalent dose of fructose.</p></div>
<p>Not <em>all</em> of the metabolic effects. Your body responds to the rate at which you fuel it. So, if an apple feeds your body fructose at a slower rate, your body handles it differently.</p>This comment  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/35403">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35403&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (3)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:51:36 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>More than just about Romney - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35396</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35396</guid>
         <description>
         In the link "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/links/PEW_EXIT_POLL_More_Mormons_Voted_For_George_Bush_In_2004_Than_Mitt_Romney_In_2012">PEW EXIT POLL: More Mormons Voted For George Bush In 2004 Than Mitt Romney In 2012</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><p>This is interesting, but there&#8217;s a lot more going on here. First, I know a good number of Mormons in Texas who identify with the Tea Party movement, and many of them didn&#8217;t like Romney and had resolved to write someone in. Also, I know many more liberal Mormons now than I did four years ago.</p>
<p>So, <span class="caps">IMO</span>, this tells us more about the political affiliation of Mormons than it tells us about Romney-vs-Bush popularity among Mormons across the board.</p>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35396&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (1)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 12:08:39 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Um, no. - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35388</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35388</guid>
         <description>
         In the article "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Do_Dolphins_And_Other_Cetaceans_Deserve_The_Same_Rights_As_Humans">Do Dolphins (And Other Cetaceans) Deserve The Same Rights As Humans?</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><p>And I didn&#8217;t even read the article.</p>
<p>:/</p>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35388&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (2)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:53:01 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RE: The tone of the article is a bit crazed - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35386</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35386</guid>
         <description>
         In the link "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/links/Reductionism_Dinner_Goes_to_Pieces">Reductionism: Dinner Goes to Pieces</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><div class="reply_quotation"><p>The 3g of fiber isn’t going to make a significant difference to the process of digesting more than four times that in sugar.</p></div>
<p>&#8230; if you assume some required (mass?) ratio for digestion effects. What&#8217;s your justification for that?</p>
<div class="reply_quotation"><p>sucrose and fructose are metabolically similar.</p></div>
<p>Sucrose is part fructose, part glucose. You should really watch the video link I sent, but if you want a more accessible explanation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sucrose</p>This comment  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/35386">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35386&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (5)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 14:55:31 -0800</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RE: The tone of the article is a bit crazed - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35380</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35380</guid>
         <description>
         In the link "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/links/Reductionism_Dinner_Goes_to_Pieces">Reductionism: Dinner Goes to Pieces</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><div class="reply_quotation"><p>They’re shocked that an apple, poster child of healthy food, appears as nothing more than a bundle of sugars. But, of course, it is nothing more than a bundle of sugars. Eat nothing but apples, and you’ll get sick — in essentially the same way as if you lived entirely on Coke.</p></div>
<p>Completely disagree. In fact, this sort of thinking is exactly what the article is about &#8211; and one of the major things that keeps Americans unhealthy despite their affluence.</p>This comment  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/35380">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35380&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (7)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:50:39 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RE: Gots me some ideas - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35374</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35374</guid>
         <description>
         In the article "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/OmniNerd_Version_6">OmniNerd Version 6</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><p>Maybe have a toggle on the newest page to show it either way?</p>
<p>I think default should be based on article/link post timestamp, though.</p>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35374&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (0)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:45:34 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>RE: Rule of Thumb: Don&#x27;t Cheat - Comment</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35373</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/comments/35373</guid>
         <description>
         In the link "<a href="http://www.omninerd.com/links/Artificial_Sweeteners_Cause_More_Weight_Gain_Than_Sugar">Artificial Sweeteners Cause More Weight Gain Than Sugar</a>," Brandon wrote:<br/><p>Another rule of thumb: Eat whole foods.</p>
<p>http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/why-whole-foods-are-more-sum-their-parts1</p>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=35373&amp;content_type=Comment#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (0)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 19:44:10 -0700</pubDate>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Music Purchase Log: 2012 Q3 - Article</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Music_Purchase_Log_2012_Q3</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Music_Purchase_Log_2012_Q3</guid>
         <description>
         <p>Music I bought in the third quarter of 2012:</p>
<table>
	<tr>
		<th>Artist </th>
		<th>Album </th>
		<th>Genre </th>
		<th>Release </th>
		<th>Recommended if you like&#8230; </th>
		<th>Notes </th>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td> Bad Books </td>
		<td> <em>Bad Books</em> </td>
		<td> Indie rock </td>
		<td> 2010 </td>
		<td> Manchester Orchestra, Kevin Devine </td>
		<td> I&#8217;d like a little more MO and a little less Devine. Luckily, I think they go that way on their next album. </td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td> Band of Horses </td>
		<td> <em>Mirage Rock</em> </td>
		<td> Indie rock </td>
		<td> 2012 </td>
		<td> Fleet Foxes, Rogue Wave </td>
		<td> A couple songs are too country for me, but otherwise yet another solid album for you (and the wife). </td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td> Ben Kweller </td>
		<td> <em>Go Fly a Kite</em> </td>
		<td> Indie rock </td>
		<td> 2012 </td>
		<td> Ben Folds, Matt Pond PA </td>
		<td> Not on par with his best work, but worth getting if you&#8217;re a fan. </td>
	</tr>
</table>This article  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Music_Purchase_Log_2012_Q3">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=4174&amp;content_type=Article#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (7)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 22:20:02 -0700</pubDate>
            <category>indie</category>
            <category>rock</category>
            <category>punk</category>
            <category>hardcore</category>
            <category>alternative</category>
            <category>music</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Three Simple First Steps from the American Diet to Health - Article</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Three_Simple_First_Steps_from_the_American_Diet_to_Health</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Three_Simple_First_Steps_from_the_American_Diet_to_Health</guid>
         <description>
         
        <div style="float: right; background: #fff; text-align: center; padding: 0px; margin: 15px 10px 5px 10px; width: 200px">
          <a href="/articles/Three_Simple_First_Steps_from_the_American_Diet_to_Health"><img alt="4_article_4163_icon_iwonttellyouifyouarehealthy" src="/assets/content/4/4_article_4163_icon_iwonttellyouifyouarehealthy.jpg" style="display: block; margin: 0px auto; border: 0px solid #f6f6f6; padding: 0px; max-width: 200px" /></a>
        </div>
<p>It amazes me that the vast majority of educated Americans don&#8217;t know what it means to be healthy. They think if they keep their waistline, heart rate and cholesterol numbers in check, then they&#8217;re good to go.</p>
<p>Wrong.</p>
<h2>Health is complex</h2>
<p>Health is complex. To illustrate, think of the following items and jot down if you think they&#8217;re good or bad for your health … or if it depends. Really, take it like a quiz.</p>
<ul>
	<li>Fat</li>
</ul>This article  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Three_Simple_First_Steps_from_the_American_Diet_to_Health">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=4163&amp;content_type=Article#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (5)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:05:10 -0700</pubDate>
            <category>health</category>
            <category>diet</category>
            <category>obesity</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Functional Song Ratings - Article</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Functional_Song_Ratings</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Functional_Song_Ratings</guid>
         <description>
         <p>I&#8217;ve used various song rating systems over the years, usually trying to find a meaningful definition for each of the six available ratings (not rated, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). The ratings were there, so I should use them &#8230; right?</p>
<p>Well, no, actually. I realized after years of rating and playing that I really only need to classify songs I own in three ways:</p>
<ul>
	<li>Songs I want to hear on the large playlist I listen to in the car and at work</li>
</ul>This article  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Functional_Song_Ratings">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=4139&amp;content_type=Article#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (2)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:59:27 -0700</pubDate>
            <category>music</category>
            <category>song</category>
            <category>ratings</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Music Purchase Log: 2012 Q2 - Article</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Music_Purchase_Log_2012_Q2</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Music_Purchase_Log_2012_Q2</guid>
         <description>
         <p>Music I purchased in the second quarter of 2012:</p>
<ul>
	<li>Bear Vs Shark &#8211; <em>Right Now, You&#8217;re in the Best of Hands</em></li>
	<li>Beecher &#8211; <em>Breaking the Fourth Wall</em></li>
	<li>Bled, The &#8211; <em>Heat Fetish</em></li>
	<li>Bullets and Octane &#8211; <em>In the Mouth of the Young</em> &#8211; Some good tunes, but not enough of them. It&#8217;s almost like they&#8217;re forcing it to work.</li>
	<li>Bush &#8211; <em>Sea of Memories</em> &#8211; Nice to see they&#8217;re back in action, but this is one I probably won&#8217;t return to often. Not that I regret getting it; my tastes have just moved on.</li>
</ul>This article  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Music_Purchase_Log_2012_Q2">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=4135&amp;content_type=Article#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (0)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:10:27 -0700</pubDate>
            <category>music</category>
            <category>indie</category>
            <category>rock</category>
            <category>alternative</category>
            <category>punk</category>
            <category>hardcore</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title>Music Purchase Log: 2012 Q1 - Article</title>
         <link>http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Music_Purchase_Log_2012_Q1</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Music_Purchase_Log_2012_Q1</guid>
         <description>
         <p>Music I purchased in the first quarter of 2012:</p>
<ul>
	<li>Asking Alexandria &#8211; <em>Reckless and Relentless</em></li>
	<li>Blackout, The &#8211; <em>Best in Town</em></li>
	<li>Classic Crime, The &#8211; <em>Acoustic EP: Seattle Sessions</em></li>
	<li>Day to Remember, A &#8211; <em>What Separates Me from You</em></li>
	<li>Demon Hunter &#8211; <em>The World Is a Thorn</em></li>
	<li>Distillers, The &#8211; <em>Coral Feng</em> &#8211; Not quite as much angst on this one, but still top-notch (and slightly poppy) punk.</li>
	<li>Four Year Strong &#8211; <em>Enemy of the World</em></li>
</ul>This article  continues, read the rest on <a href="http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Music_Purchase_Log_2012_Q1">OmniNerd</a>.<br/>
         
         <br/><a href="/comments/new?content_id=4105&amp;content_type=Article#comment_form_header">Add a Comment (0)</a>         </description>
         <author>Brandon</author>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2012 13:49:38 -0700</pubDate>
            <category>indie</category>
            <category>rock</category>
            <category>punk</category>
            <category>hardcore</category>
            <category>alternative</category>
            <category>music</category>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
