Personally, I think the government needs to get out of the marriage business.
Protect unions of two consenting adults and allow them the same benefits.
Are you saying they should specify two, or was that a slip up? Because really, why should the government care if there are more?
Call your union whatever you want, but one name under the law for legal purposes.
Would you oppose using something other than “marriage” as that name? Say, something sterile and generally undesirable like “designated legal partner in personal matters” – or, DLPIPM?
* * item2.1
# # item2.1
Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.