Thank you Scott. That video rings true and puts this whole fake scandal beat up nicely into perspective. A cock-up is usually more probable than a conspiracy.

As I suspected, the reporting simply demonstrates the lack of understanding of how scientists talk to each other, and the poor research skills by those loud mouth commentators. Well, I guess they are not trained journalists so they don’t know any better. And they really, really wanted it to be the way they told it.

There is no evidence supporting the anti ACC case at all in these e-mails then. They did not mean what these fools thought they meant and wanted them to mean.

This calm, professional British reporter contrasts so starkly with the hyperbolic American ones he is contradicting.

Interesting to see those shock jock clowns trawling the Russia Today cable channel for their news. I watch it often, and I actually think that channel sometimes has a good angle on the news, but I am rather surprised at these guys quoting what they might be expected to berate as a “left wing” source.