0 Nerd-Its - +

Many TOP Diggers are just Submiting Good Stories with Good Titles and Descriptions

Comment a comment by SearchEngines, published on 09 September 2006
Navigate to the top level to view all replies to the article Digg Changes Algorithm; Top User Resigns
other nerds have left 32 comments below

What is meant by a TOP DIGGER?
Many Top Diggers are just submitting Good Stories – a percentage become homepage popular – they are NOT involved any conspiracy whatsoever

http://digg.com/users/searchengines/homepage

Many Stories on the Homepage get Hundreds and Sometimes THOUSANDS of Diggs.
Can you really have THAT many people around the world who are all virtually strangers, involved in a conspiracy?
The Title and Description used is very influential. And so is the SITE being Digged, Webmasters sometimes INVITE Diggs by placing conspicious "Digg This" or Reddit This" or "Delicious This" links.
As with any innovative Web 2.0 concept, it has to be tweaked and chiseled to perfection.

Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:
0 Nerd-Its - +
RE: Many TOP Diggers are just Submiting Good Stories with Good Titles and Descriptions by Anonymous :: NR0

Look, its like this.

This article is TOTALLY biased. The issue in question for the legit people who had a problem was that people were digging articles that they had never even read. Auto digging is gaming the system.

P9 got busted and couldnt stand the fact that people all over the internet were laughing at him, so he threw himself a pity party that no one came to.

If P9 wants to submit, more power to him, but I dont want his stories hitting the front page because he can IM his friends who happen to have a script that logs them in, and auto diggs the stories of the guy sending the IM , all in under a minute.

Get your bias out of the way before you submit another shitty blog to digg.

Posted 11 September 2006, Hide, Parent, Reply

The Showcase

Nerd-Its   Nerd Trends   Last Ten  

  1. RE: The true solution in Scientology: We've had it with you
  2. RE: Actually... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  3. RE: Actually... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  4. RE: The true solution in Scientology: We've had it with you
  5. RE: The true solution in Scientology: We've had it with you
  6. RE: Actually... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  7. RE: Actually... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  8. RE: The true solution in Scientology: We've had it with you
  9. RE: Actually... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  10. RE: Discussing Book of Mormon anachronisms in God before Country in the Military

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

The Interstate Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution empowers Congress to regulate?

View Results, All Polls
4 votes, 0 comments