0 Votes
RE: Disappearing Options
Now you’re finally getting what Mormonism is all about.
Yes, it appears so. Thanks.
It takes a while to break through the apologist bullshit and see down to the 19 th century Masonic roots of exclusion, secrecy, blood oaths, and pagan ritual.
These things have been witewashed out of modern LDS in the effort to gain respectability and appeal to the mainstream, but they are still there if you scratch the surface, as those witnesses I described testify.
You didn’t address that the decisions of the bride/groom and mother play just as big a role in the situation as the Church’s policy.
The Church policy considered the wishes of the family irrelevant, so I did not bother to go into them, except to assume that the desire of a mother to attend her daughter’s wedding was natural and human, and the desire to prevent that is the opposite.
Why can’t you accept that the mother did not want to return to the bosom of the church: she just wanted to see her daughter’s wedding.
Yes, actually the Discipline of the LDS hates mothers. The lot of them.
No. Only mothers that piss off the LDS.
and it just doesn’t add up.
No. It multiplies.
RE: Disappearing Options by Brandon
It takes a while to break through the apologist bullshit and see down to the 19 th century Masonic roots of exclusion, secrecy, blood oaths, and pagan ritual. These things have been witewashed out of modern LDS in the effort to gain respectability and appeal to the mainstream, but they are still there if you scratch the surface, as those witnesses I described testify.
Those are some old witnesses.
Why can’t you accept that the mother did not want to return to the bosom of the church: she just wanted to see her daughter’s wedding.
So why didn’t her daughter let her? All she had to do was have a ring ceremony (which would be exactly like a wedding) outside the temple.
No. Only mothers that piss off the LDS.
I think you mean the Discipline of the LDS. Let’s keep our terms straight here.