nerdy?

thanks Vea or Occams!

Honestly, I don’t care what someone believes, that’s scottb and occams’ shtick. I take issue with the ID community because the claim is that ID is a bonified scientific theory, yet it lacks all of the ingredients of a theory. That is where my issue lies. Slander? No, I was just providing the conditions under which ID can be accepted as a theory. No more, no less.

I will nerd up a comment that makes me chuckle, or makes me think. Nerdiness? That matters a bit less. I will nerd down someone who comes across as a raving lunatic, and unfortunately “the believer” crowd contains more than a few. I must point out, though, my comments in this thread have said nothing about whether I believe or not. Nor, does science specifically exclude a deity.

I’d like to point out one more thing. Whenever I post such a challenge to the ID crowd I never, I repeat, I never get a response to the challenge itself. It is completely ignored by them. Instead, I get something like this, which doesn’t say anything whatsoever on why such “scientists” support ID, or how they deal with the criteria of a scientific theory. In essence, this is only the illusion of a debate, there is really nothing to see here.