There are 450,000,000,000 peer reviewed papers that provide absolute incotrovertible proof beyond any reasonable or even sane discussion. So those 450 that obviously slipped past the process (which is ABOVE ALL REPROACH!) only represent 1/1,000,000,000 th of the papers and are therefore considered “lunatic fringe”. These papers are clearly the rantings of people who want our world to be destroyed just like the documentary “The Day After Tomorrow” which shows us exactly what will happen very, very soon.
As you know, I am a noob around here. I don’t know you well enough to know if you are kidding or not…
I am going to assume you are and give you a “hehehehehehe” and a grin… :^D
Yeah, I was being facetious.
I think there’s a possibility of AGW being true. At the least we are making a natural warming cycle more extreme with our poor usage of our natural resources.
But with an as of yet non-trivial minority of scientists who say it’s not, I will reserve judgement, plug in my CFLs, turn down the heat pump a couple of degrees and wait for the matter to get figured out by those who know better.
Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.