’m talking about huge drops in occurrences before the vaccine even exists.
OK fair enough.
I saw a documentary recently which tried to show that the bubonic plague outbreak in London in the fifteenth century killed fewer people than the one in the fourteenth century and so on. Many more people survived the later outbreaks. The thesis was that survivors passed on immunity. I’m not sure this is good science yet but, it sounds reasonable.
If true, it might help explain what you are takling about. Natural vaccinations might protect people.
Yeah, vaccines don’t allow that sort of “natural vaccine” (or immunity) to develop to the same extent. Of course, that by itself doesn’t mean vaccines are a bad idea, but it is something to consider.
RE: Vaccines didn't cause GWS (or autism, or ___, or ...) by Brandon :: NR9 :: Show
Yeah, vaccines don’t allow that sort of “natural vaccine” (or immunity) to develop to the same extent. Of course, that by itself doesn’t mean vaccines are a bad idea, but it is something to consider.