Well, if we’re going to be nit-picky, I’ll still have to disagree.
The term “autism” refers to the set of symptoms that characterize “autistic disorder”, but because those symptoms overlap to a substantial degree with Asperger’s syndrome and PDD-NOS, the term has become somewhat ambiguous, but is often clearly used to refer specifically to autistic disorder, while ASD is used for the broader grouping.
The terminology of autism can be bewildering, with autism, Asperger syndrome and PDD-NOS often called the autism spectrum disorders (ASD) or sometimes the autistic disorders, whereas autism itself is often called autistic disorder, childhood autism, or infantile autism. In this article, autism refers to the classic autistic disorder; in clinical practice, though, autism, ASD, and PDD are often used interchangeably. ASD, in turn, is a subset of the broader autism phenotype, which describes individuals who may not have ASD but do have autistic-like traits, such as avoiding eye contact.
Clear as mud, no?
The problem is really that the notion of a spectrum of disorders related to autism is relatively new, only coming about over the last twenty years. Language is often much slower to adapt.
It wasn’t my intent to get into a technical medical parsing of the term(s), I’m just trying to facilitate clear communication.
Somebody farther up the thread said something like “autism rate in the US is 1 in 94,” to which you replied “no, it’s more like 1 or 2 per thousand.” Clearly (to me, anyway), he was referring broadly to ASDs and you were referring narrowly to autistic disorder. To a reader not familiar with the terms and their common usage, one could conclude that either you or he had the facts wrong, when in fact you both were right by your own definitions of the term “autism.”
I was simply trying to clarify for you and any other readers that the .75-1% prevalence rate was correct in terms of the broader definition of autism (i.e., ASD) as opposed to the narrower definition you used.
My source for saying that the broader definition is the “more commonly used” one is both my own personal experience, and Page 3 of the report you linked to two comments ago.
RE: Vaccines didn't cause GWS (or autism, or ___, or ...) by mikeforbes :: NR6 :: Show
It wasn’t my intent to get into a technical medical parsing of the term(s), I’m just trying to facilitate clear communication.
Somebody farther up the thread said something like “autism rate in the US is 1 in 94,” to which you replied “no, it’s more like 1 or 2 per thousand.” Clearly (to me, anyway), he was referring broadly to ASDs and you were referring narrowly to autistic disorder. To a reader not familiar with the terms and their common usage, one could conclude that either you or he had the facts wrong, when in fact you both were right by your own definitions of the term “autism.”
I was simply trying to clarify for you and any other readers that the .75-1% prevalence rate was correct in terms of the broader definition of autism (i.e., ASD) as opposed to the narrower definition you used.
My source for saying that the broader definition is the “more commonly used” one is both my own personal experience, and Page 3 of the report you linked to two comments ago.