|
|
The Showcase
-
RE: We can do better.
in U.S. Healthcare: the Best, the Worst, and the Irrelevant
-
RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but ....
in Scientology: We've had it with you
-
RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but ....
in Scientology: We've had it with you
-
RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but ....
in Scientology: We've had it with you
-
RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but ....
in Scientology: We've had it with you
-
RE: Sick care
in U.S. Healthcare: the Best, the Worst, and the Irrelevant
-
RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but ....
in Scientology: We've had it with you
-
RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but ....
in Scientology: We've had it with you
-
We can do better.
in U.S. Healthcare: the Best, the Worst, and the Irrelevant
-
RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but ....
in Scientology: We've had it with you
|
RE: Vaccines didn't cause GWS (or autism, or ___, or ...) by Brandon :: NR9 :: Show
I’m not sure how you can read the conclusions quoted in my original post and think report authors consider the door closed:
The Asa/Tulane studies may have correctly identified excess rates of squalene antibodies in ill veterans, whether or not they were caused by vaccines, by vaccine contamination, or by clandestine use of an unapproved adjuvant. It is important to determine whether the observed association between squalene antibodies and Gulf War illness is supported, or refuted, by more definitive research.
As for the portion you quoted, I agree it frowns on the idea of an association between the anthrax vaccine and GWS. It does, however, specifically claim “an association between Gulf War illness and receipt of a large number of vaccines cannot be ruled out.”