0 Nerd-Its - +

RE: Don't think women should fight

Comment a comment by Barry (Occams), published on 24 October 2009
Navigate to the top level to view all replies to the poll Should women perform in combat roles?
Navigate up one level to see this comment's parent.
other nerds have left 4 comments below

Scott is completely independent of both Catholic and Protestant dogma and he is an objective scientific thinker. That puts him way ahead of you and I. Of course the burden of proof is on you. That’s Occam’s raser. If you want people to believe in the supernatural you had better be able to prove it.

He was absolutely correct to point out that the Catholics are not the least little bit impressed by your interpretation of the scriptures because they know that you are not qualified to interpret that metaphorical text realistically. I strongly suspect that absolutely nothing in the Bible means what you think it means.

The farcical interpretations that you frequently provide us here are the reason why the Catholics discourage that practice. It makes you look unchristian when you get it so woefully wrong.

Look at what you said next:

if I don’t have to depend on the scriptures then I have made myself God…

What?!! Most people don’t depend on the scriptures.

Have all non believers God then? Does God not believe in himself? Duh!

This is an excellent example of your atrocious reasoning. If you can come to that conclusion, then subject stuff just too hard for you. Get some help.

If you can remove your dependence on the scriptures you have made yourself a little more objective and therefore believable. That’s all.

I have observed Scott’s discussion on religion over the years on this forum and he is easily the best informed and most coherent speaker on that subject amongst the ON regulars. He does not need to be a believer to be knowledgeable on this subject. Indeed, that is a hindrance because he has no faith to confuse his reason, as do you.

Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:

You’re seriously not even worth wasting reasoning on Occams you have yet to prove you can produce effective arguments.

Come up with an original thought (like, one that scottb hasn’t already indoctrinated you with) then will talk.

k?

The Showcase

Nerd-Its   Nerd Trends   Last Ten  

  1. The world could end, any moment, any second... in NASA: THE WORLD WILL NOT END IN 2012
  2. RE: We can do better. in U.S. Healthcare: the Best, the Worst, and the Irrelevant
  3. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  4. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  5. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  6. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  7. RE: Sick care in U.S. Healthcare: the Best, the Worst, and the Irrelevant
  8. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  9. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  10. We can do better. in U.S. Healthcare: the Best, the Worst, and the Irrelevant

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

The Interstate Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution empowers Congress to regulate?

10 votes, 0 comments