The parallel between environmentalism and religion is an apt one, although I think you could look at a lot of things as though they are religions. Economics and consumerism are my favourite example—a religion complete with a belief in a transcendent power (the market), a priesthood (economists, bankers, accountants), cathedrals (shopping malls, office towers), and even shrines (banks, banking machines) where people complete little rituals before going about their business.
But I think you’re right in that environmentalism may be one place where science and many flavours of traditional religion meet. A lot of religions, such as Neo-Paganism and Indigenous traditions, are explicitly environmental as well. If you view nature as a fragile balance, you can’t help but be concerned for it.
Check out Faith and the Common Good for an example of a multi-faith environmental awareness project. They’ve tried to co-ordinate their efforts with David Suzuki in the past, as well.
Yes, I agree about economics. I have had to deal with several evangelical fundamentalist economists. Market Heaven is a very uncomfortable place to live.
I actually don’t believe that science has much to learn from religion, except in one area. Religions are better at politics. At least, this is true in the USA.
In mobilizing government to fight the environmental catastrophe a unity of religion and science would be much more effective. Global warming is a very difficult science to understand. It is much easier for us ordinary folk to trust the science gurus and act on faith – as is the norm with religion.
RE: Striking Parallels by Occams :: NR8 :: Show
Yes, I agree about economics. I have had to deal with several evangelical fundamentalist economists. Market Heaven is a very uncomfortable place to live.
I actually don’t believe that science has much to learn from religion, except in one area. Religions are better at politics. At least, this is true in the USA.
In mobilizing government to fight the environmental catastrophe a unity of religion and science would be much more effective. Global warming is a very difficult science to understand. It is much easier for us ordinary folk to trust the science gurus and act on faith – as is the norm with religion.