Loading 0 Votes - +

Risk Mitigation

In nearly every instance of ‘mass shootings’, the shooter(s) are mentally unbalanced, using mind altering substances, or the shooting occurs during a moment of uncontrolled rage.

I’m not American, merely an Australian nerd. We don’t have the same culture regarding guns; so I apologise if this post is presumptive. Sadly, Australia has had some significant mass-slayings of its own.

I think removing guns is good risk mitigation as people identified by ldsudduth are unlikely to be able to source a highly effective weapon during their period of mental unbalance. The removal of high-powered weapons from the general community is not meant to disarm criminals, but make it harder for mentally unbalanced people to acquire highly effective weapons.

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

Dzhokar Tsarnaev deserves due process?

35 votes, 4 comments