Login or Register

Forgot?
I'm new, register me!

What is OmniNerd?

100% of OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. OmniNerd allows content of all sorts and highlights the nerdiest of what's around.

Want to know more? Check out our welcome page, or simply register and have a first-hand look.

Submit New Content

Voting Booth

Been a victim of a violent crime?

67 votes, 4 comments
1
Nerd-It
+ -

dangerous if overgeneralized.

Comment comment by NomadSoul on 08 May 2008

In a huge emergency, it's understandable (horrific, but understandable) that care is prioritized in this way. I'm not sure it's the best response, but it may be the only effective short-term response to this kind of emergency.

The thing about this that bothers me is that there's a pervasive need by some to generalize this kind of thinking to everyday life. If you're not healthy or wealthy enough, or the right age or colour, you may be denied access to health care or education or social services... Or, to put it another way, a major emergency is the only time that social Darwinism or even mainstream Economics makes any kind of sense.

Or, to put it yet another way, the pace of North American life makes us all behave as if we're living in a low-level emergency all the time, justifying all manner of stupidity simply because "it must get done"--and right now.

Favorite
[Show/Hide] [Reply]   3 Nerd-Its - + Favorite
RE: dangerous if overgeneralized. by LordDilly :: NR8 :: on 09 May 2008

The thing about this that bothers me is that there's a pervasive need by some to generalize this kind of thinking to everyday life.

Utilitarian Bio-ethics, as preached by the monstrous (yet highly regarded in academia, which is chilling) Peter Singer.

[Show/Hide] [Reply]   2 Nerd-Its - + Favorite
RE: dangerous if overgeneralized. by NomadSoul :: NR5 :: on 09 May 2008

Yeah--utilitiarianism and consequentialism are occasionally necessary, but should never be a solitary mode of thinking--that is, unless we want to return to feudalism.