What is OmniNerd?

Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.

Submit New Content

Voting Booth

Ever lie?

16 votes, 1 comment
3
Nerd-Its
+ -

My Ninjas are Already Watching You

Comment comment by VnutZ on 25 April 2008

Your statement both reinforces my point and shows the misperception about aggregators. You are exactly correct in saying OmniNerd is not an authoritative site. It's never claimed to be.

For instance, if I were arguing that particular driving habits are absolutely influential on fuel economy and simply said - "because OmniNerd said so" than by all means, call me an idiot and dismiss the source. But if I make the statement that the driving habit of using an air conditioner at high speed burns more gas than driving at high RPM in the wrong gear and cited the researched and experimental data from Improve MPG: The Factors Affecting Fuel Efficiency than I would be making a valid reference worth citing.

The article itself stands by itself. Just as you may have researched and written a fantastic paper in college but been a complete dud at every other class you took. Does that take away from the reference quality of the paper? Absolutely not. If it stands on its own and can serve to educate someone else, than it serves its purpose and does it well.

So the fact that a compendium of community knowledge would simply dismiss an article that is highly relevant to its topic as "poor quality" just based on who is hosting it is ridiculous. For years an article I'd written on another site was well regarded by Wikipedia as authoritative ... but when I ported it to ON and changed the link it was immediately blacklisted. I changed it back to the old link (the exact same content!!) and the editor seemed perfectly content again. That to me is evidence the editing is not based on any sense of verification on content but rather simply whims that suit whoever "claims ownership" of a Wikipedia entry.

So like I said, your comment that individual articles "re well-written and researched, but people associate authority with a narrower field of expertise" is on target. But that should make somebody wonder. Are magazines like Popular Mechanics that feature an excellent article on home building authorities in that field? No. But the author who wrote that article and did that research may be. It's really the same thing.

Star This to Save in Your Profile Favorite