If it were really about safety then it would be easy to remove any doubt by making the revenues raised go to some federal fund that would further raise safety by improving road infrastructure - with a percentage siphoned of to enable the purchase of more cameras.
It would be very telling to see the county losing interest in more cameras because there was no financial return.
The worst policy would be to outsource the camera service in the way that is suggested by the Lockheed Martin example.
Add a Comment
Email This
RSS
RE: not about safety
If it were really about safety then it would be easy to remove any doubt by making the revenues raised go to some federal fund that would further raise safety by improving road infrastructure - with a percentage siphoned of to enable the purchase of more cameras.
It would be very telling to see the county losing interest in more cameras because there was no financial return.
The worst policy would be to outsource the camera service in the way that is suggested by the Lockheed Martin example.
View Full Discussion