Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:
Sorry, messed up my login again. That last anon was from me.
Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.
Sorry, messed up my login again. That last anon was from me.
RE: The troops in Iran & Afghanistan
Or we could assume that there are a lot of sensible people in the world who still look to America for leadership, but who would like to listen to and contribute to the debate. If our case is strong it will stand up to this sort of examination. America is not the only country going to the aid of peoples in distress. and/or making a botch of it.
This is a very difficult thing to do well, and we should encourage others to advise us. For example, the Australians, in East Timor, Papua New Guinea, and the Solomon Islands seem to have a superior way of managing these things with their military and police contingents. Even in Afghanistan, they seem to be getting on better with the local popuation and minimising their causualties while still participating indangerous operations.
Our differences of opinion have been well established in previous debate. I agree with you that the effect of our intervention has been to put off a murderous retaliation against the Iraquis who we have supported and who have supported us. That is the essence of our dilemma. How long will Americans be prepared to go on making the sacrifices that they have been making for the last three years. I suspect not for many more years, and then the retaliation will happen anyway.
There has never, ever been in Iraq or Afghanistan a moderate government that America would be happy with, so any attempt to make one now would require vastly more resources than Congress would ever be prepared, or capable of, allocating. I am sure you have seen the analysis of this proposition by Prof Hugh White I recently posted elsewhere on this forum
I suspect that being an anti-war activist in America is far from being a childish or safe preoccupation. Blocking transport is the most common form of protest in France because it forces everyone to think about the issues. It may be infuriating but it is effective in attracting attention. As you say mere ranting would be totally ineffective, and the protesters are not stupid. They may even be very patriotic people who are trying to help this coutry to get out of a very bad situation that mindless "partiotic" support for very the poor foreign policyof the present Administration has gotten us into.
A country like ours ought to be able to handle such a trivial protest peacefully - without silly vitriol, and without causing any harm to our wor effort. It is a symbolic tactic and symbols are merely token mental props, having only the meaning that we allow them to have.
View Full Discussion