What is OmniNerd?

Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.

Submit New Content

Voting Booth

Reaction to Michelle Obama saying, "For the first time, I am proud of my country"?

View Results, All Polls
41 votes, 7 comments
3
Nerd-Its
+ -

RE: Where's the analysis?

Comment comment by VnutZ on 02 November 2007

Woah ... that's pretty deep. Might need the Monkey Computer to handle that one!

I think, however, that going off the deep end of prediction would find more immediate relevance in comparing weather conditions (barometric pressure specifically and rise or fall). Additionally, I think there is less value in the Earth's rotation while there would be more of an effect from the moon's position and the annual proximity to the sun. All way out there but it would of course, be interesting.

You are a viewing a subset of a larger discussion.
View Full Discussion
Star This to Save in Your Profile Favorite
Thread parent sort order:
Highest Voted : Lowest Voted : Oldest : Newest
Thread verbosity:
Expand All : Minimize Replies to Comments
1 Nerd-It - +
RE: Where's the analysis? by scottb :: NR7

Moreover, the lottery is drawn pretty close to the same time every day. It's done live on TV, in a scheduled slot. I doubt there's more than a few minutes variation in time-of-day from drawing to drawing. How accurate might you have to measure to get an input with sufficient precision to make useful predictions? Milliseconds? Picoseconds?

If the relationship between time of day and the drawing is deterministic, but it's that non-linearly dependent on the conditions (the precise picosecond), I doubt you could prove it - even if you had access to the machines to instrument them and a huge experimental budget.

Posted 02 November 2007, Hide, Parent, Reply