What is OmniNerd?

Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.

Submit New Content

Voting Booth

Is it possible that in the distant future, President George W. Bush, the 43rd president, might be viewed as one of the greatest American Presidents?

46 votes, 8 comments
2
Nerd-Its
+ -

RE: Where's the analysis?

Comment comment by Anonymous on 02 November 2007

What I was looking for in my previous post was, the order and time the numbers were drawn. I wanted to use the analysis calculated by the earth's rotation including leap year minutes (x=(525,600*.25)+525,600) to see if there is indeed an prediction that can be achieved based on moments of time.

I know it is a bit much but I do not believe in randomnimity. I believe the word random was invented to fill in an explaination of things that happen on time intervals that we cannot explain. Thus my ultimate theory is that a number drawn can be predicted at the exact second, the trick is, finding the right calculation. Who knows if the Julian calendar is even the right approach?

I know it is out there and probably deemed cooky, but what if?

-IVX

Star This to Save in Your Profile Favorite
Thread parent sort order:
Highest Voted : Lowest Voted : Oldest : Newest
Thread verbosity:
Expand All : Minimize Replies to Comments
3 Nerd-Its - +
RE: Where's the analysis? by VnutZ :: NR8

Woah ... that's pretty deep. Might need the Monkey Computer to handle that one!

I think, however, that going off the deep end of prediction would find more immediate relevance in comparing weather conditions (barometric pressure specifically and rise or fall). Additionally, I think there is less value in the Earth's rotation while there would be more of an effect from the moon's position and the annual proximity to the sun. All way out there but it would of course, be interesting.