What is OmniNerd?

Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.

Submit New Content

Voting Booth

Choosing Sarah Palin as a Vice Presidential running mate was?

34 votes, 5 comments
0
Nerd-Its
+ -

End of an Ice Age ... or maybe it's God's Fault?

Comment comment by VnutZ on 20 January 2007

You know ... there is proof that mankind has contributed to atmospheric changes. Nobody is really going to deny that. But the Earth's climate is not a static condition that would remain over the eons had we done nothing. Geology shows that long before man, the Earth has had dramatic swings in climate, weather ... even flipping its entire magnetic fields around. Ice ages happen. Ice ages end. There's a point of idiocy with proclaiming man has everything to do with rising temperatures. The smartest thing man can do is learn to live with it rather than trying to reverse it. How stupid would we look centuries from now when all the global cooling pundits are complaining that we're entering a new ice age because man has altered the climate to counter rising temperatures?

Of course, if you truly believe in Creation, all that geology and ice age stuff is bunk. And it would be God's fault for global warming because he works in mysterious ways and is teaching us something.

Star This to Save in Your Profile Favorite
Thread parent sort order:
Highest Voted : Lowest Voted : Oldest : Newest
Thread verbosity:
Expand All : Minimize Replies to Comments

There's a point of idiocy with proclaiming man has everything to do with rising temperatures.

There would be if anyone were claiming that. On the other hand, the argument that environmentalists are presumptuous, even arrogant, for supposing that humans can have a significant effect on the environment is silly, but more importantly it's provably wrong.

The smartest thing man can do is learn to live with it rather than trying to reverse it.

Why is that smartest? If you can defend that claim, it would be fresh and interesting and get a lot of well-deserved attention.

How do "we", including billions of people already near famine in undeveloped areas, learn to live with it?

How stupid would we look centuries from now when all the global cooling pundits are complaining that we're entering a new ice age because man has altered the climate to counter rising temperatures?

Probably really smart. Centuries from now we'll have at least the same tools we do now, and we'll be glad we didn't wipe out millions of people back in the 2020s.

You're not thinking clearly about causality and ethics. We have power. We can use it. You're proposing, metaphorically, that we keep playing with matches and just learn to live with it if our house is on fire. Because how silly will we look in a week if there's fire extinguisher foam on the sofa?