Add a Comment
Email This
Statistics
Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:
Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.
|
Copyright © OmniNerd 2004-2008 OmniNerd uses valid, standards-based markup.
Maximize enjoyment with a standards-compliant browser. |
RSS
Great Article! One minor clarification
Excellent article! I found it to be a very good synopsis of the issue and I will be referring friends and family to it so that they can get an idea of what I'm all excited about over the holidays.
One minor clarification I would make: In mentioning the Petition for Review filed by Verizon with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, you indicate that the "arbitrary, capricious, unsupported by substantial evidence . . ." language resembles AT&T's argument from Carterphone. this is entirely true, however the reason is that this language is the standard for a reviewing court to overrule an agency decision under the Administrative Procedure Act. See 5 U.S.C. Sec. 706. This a standard argument in any such appeal.
View Full Discussion