Add a Comment
Email This
Statistics
Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:
Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.
|
Copyright © OmniNerd 2004-2008 OmniNerd uses valid, standards-based markup.
Maximize enjoyment with a standards-compliant browser. |
RSS
RE: what really concerns me
From reading the article, it appears as though the reporter is quoting the Team Leader, a Dr. Chris Klingenberg as stating that his team's study disproves creation.
Hm. I suspect there's some incorrectly placed quotation marks there.
But even if the researcher did say it, I don't think it really matters. First of all, the study is evidence supporting evolution - it's not "bad science", it's just science. It just doesn't show anything new. And with regard to creationism's nonsense, the research doesn't show anything that's in contention.
The conclusions of the scientists were perfectly valid. The reporter chose to spin the whole thing as evolution vs creationism.
View Full Discussion