Loading 7 Votes - +

Will the 'Album' Format for Music Release Be Obsolete Soon?

572_article_2363_thumb_record

In the depths of my basement, lined up on an old bookshelf, I have about 300 vinyl record albums that just sit slowly rotting away as the years go by. There’s also probably about 100 CD’s also starting to gatherer dust as time passes and downloaded digital media reigns. Some of the old rock music is still popular with my two high school aged teens, so occasionally I will take the opportunity to dive down there and emerge triumphantly with an ancient album in hand when a classic old band happens to be mentioned in casual conversation. The kids look at it in the same way I might look at artifacts in a museum; with interest, but no lasting enthusiasm. The pictures are neat; the hairdos are funny, “look at those clothes”— “Was Ozzy ever really that young?”, etc. As for myself, I can remember the entire experience of buying an album consisting of more than just the music. Much of it had to do with placing the record in the player and spending an hour or so listening while poring over the album jacket, which in the more interesting cases consisted of fantastic artwork mixed with news, lyrics and pictures of the band members. Some albums like the Beatles or Jethro Tull had up to 20 pages in a hardcover book form if you had an original or early release. Many contained posters and other promotional paraphernalia along with the recorded music. There seemed to be as much work going into the album presentation as went into actual music itself.

And so, I have some nostalgic pangs when I hear speculation that the very format of artists releasing music in album format might also be heading the way of the dodo or dinosaur. Granted, the advent of CD’s put a damper on album art for the most part, but a group or artist’s music is still presented as a named collection; usually with a theme and sound unique to that particular album. Digital downloading is bringing us back to the “Singles” method of music distribution much as it was in the era of 45’s where you bought your music in a smaller cheaper form, and only received the exact song you know you paid for. There are certainly some advantages to this from a consumers point of view; namely, you get only what you paid for, no more, no less. I can remember every so often buying an album because I knew I liked one or two songs on it, only to be disappointed in finding those two songs were the only good songs on the album.
Blogger ‘aramsinnreich’ writes that the album “is essentially an arbitrary product based on the limited capacity of 20th century recording and distribution technology.

Having fully adopted digital music myself for all the obvious reasons in the last 5 years or so, I can’t help wondering if sentiments like these may be driving the wave of the future when it comes to musical releases. Artists like Smashing Pumpkins claim they won’t be releasing albums at all any more, with front man Billy Corgan stating,

“People don’t even listen to it all. They put it on their iPod, they drag over the two singles, and skip over the rest. The listening patterns have changed. So why are we killing ourselves to do albums? Our primary function now is to be a singles band. We’ll still be creative, but in a different form.”

Is this ‘sour grapes’ thinking from lack of material, or is it really much more beneficial for an artist to have the freedom of just releasing singles when they are ready?

Nostalgia aside, I can really only think of one thing I will miss about albums and collections if their demise is truly imminent. Many times in the past, I would do just as Billy Corgan claimed and listen to the first three songs and call it a day. But, then one day I would put the album on and either purposely or accidentally (if I was busy doing something else) wind up listening to the whole thing. More often than not, I found I really liked that “2nd to last song on Side 2” that no one ever heard on the radio or anywhere. It was almost like having a brand new album without having to go to the store. If artists are only going to publish hits, these moments will be lost and a lot of good interesting material might go unheard. The “filler” songs on albums were often a means for an artist (for good or ill) to experiment and reach out in a new way.

The 99-cent download becomes a much more convenient throwback to the days of the “Hit Single” which carries many good features with it, but even back in the days of 45-rpm one-hit-wonders, there were still those interesting “B Sides” to listen to.

Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:

Information This article was edited after publication by the author on 29 Jan 2009. View changes.
Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:

I don’t think the album format will ever entirely go away. A lot of people, like the aforementioned Smashing Pumpkins, may decide they just want to release singles, but I think there’s something about the format that some people will want to hang on to. I’m thinking of bands like Radiohead or Nine Inch Nails—that often do an entire theme or concept for an album, kind of the way someone might make a mix tape / CD or MP3 playlist.

If you have a particular statement or message that you want your art to convey, and that happens to take more than one song, then there will always be bands that choose the longer format; even if many or most others choose to release singles. I guess the internet just provides more options—and maybe that’s where the art can come in as well; since now it often shows up on the band’s website, in addition to CD inserts and the like.

There’s also the question of recording logistics. If you want to use the latest and best recording equipment, the band (or their label) will have to get time in a studio and deal with production, editing, and related costs. So, it will just make sense to record a whole series of songs at once than to do them one at a time. At least, that’s my assumption—I’m really not sure what studio time costs in the recording industry. (I’m kind of drawing a parallel with the video game industry, where time in a mocap lab can be prohibitively expensive for smaller companies).

3 Votes  - +
I listen to albums by Brandon

I’ve always been an album listener. I was a sucker and joined Columbia House and BMG CD clubs when I was a kid, and I remember my first purchase included the likes of Pearl Jam (Ten), Nirvana (Nevermind), Alice in Chains (Dirt), Soundgarden (Badmotorfinger) and Red Hot Chili Peppers (Blood Sugar Sex Magic) … in addition to Boys II Men, Paula Abdul, The New Kids on the Block, and Janet Jackson. I listened to all of those albums multiple times through – as well as the hundreds I’ve purchased since. There are thousands of songs I love that I would have never found if I only listened to the singles.

Additionally, many albums develop a character or story of their own. The album cover and the musical ups and downs weave their way into one chapter in the story of an artist’s life. This is especially true for bands I’ve “hung with” as they made it big, sold out, broke up, found themselves, got back together, overdosed, changed lead singers, etc. It’s not the drama that’s interesting, though – it’s the history that comes out in the music.

I think I’ll always be an album listener.

3 Votes  - +
I Hope Not by bonesaw

Albums are still my favorite form of music distribution. I am 28, so I grew up with tapes, then cds (Green Day’s Dookie being my first), and now iTunes. I download songs from iTunes occasionally, but not albums. I still like to go out and buy an album in physical form. There is a certain magic to putting an album on for the first time and seeing what it has to offer. Or leaving an album in the player for several days on end, listening to it on repeat and not getting tired of it.

Songs on albums can be and often are great on their own. But a lot of times listening to them in context with the other songs on the album makes them greater. When I hear a song in mainstream media having heard it on an album, it sometimes seems like a different song. For this reason, I hope that the album will endure.

Artistically, I think the album still has promise as well. As an occasional composer and recorder of music (on Garageband), there are certain times when an artist feels more creative and can write many songs with that inspiration. It just makes sense to put them all together. A good thing about the electronic music age is that maybe this process can be more pure to the artist’s intentions. With the decreasing influence of record companies, it might make sense for a band to release an album with only 6 songs if that is all they have—or to include songs with an album that previously would have been nixed by labels. So far only the super-huge (Radiohead) and the super-small bands can go with this method but it is exciting to think of the possibilities.

Share & Socialize

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

Dzhokar Tsarnaev deserves due process?

32 votes, 4 comments