Loading 5 Votes - +

Warren Buffet Promotes Taxing Rich

30_article_3944_thumb_richie-rich

Generally speaking, large swaths of Americans believe the rich should be taxed more to make up for the government’s budget deficit. This is the general sentiment despite America’s rich already being in the highest income tax bracket owing 35% of their earnings to Uncle Sam. Interestingly, the rich tend not to actually pay nearly that much and often pay less [percentage] than the middle class. Warren Buffet recently weighed in on the matter wrote an Op-Ed for the New York Times lambasting Congress for letting the rich get away with so much. He wrote that despite paying a seemingly astronomical $6,938,744 in taxes himself, that only equates to 17% – nearly 20% less than his bracket requires. Buffet goes on to out the true tax rates the super wealthy pay thanks to creative accounting and the ability to afford protective financial services.

“While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks … My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.”

Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:

Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:

I think this is just one symptom of the the legal loophole/shortcut culture we have in America. Patents, law suits, taxes, etc., they all boil down to being able to win if you have the means to exploit loopholes and shortcuts. I like the idea of changing this, but it’s a fairly massive problem to tackle.

0 Votes  - +
Hypocrisy by Travis

Isn’t this all hypocrisy on all sides? I mean here is Warren Buffet self promoting his image by pointing out the advantage that the rich have the money to find the loop holes, yet takes advantage of it non the less. I don’t understand his self-righteousness. Is he really saying that I am only able to pay my fair share if someone makes me? Really? Why not ignore the tax advantages and pay the full 35%?

Anyway, now on to the other side of the equation. Is it not hypocrisy on those that consider themselves “not rich” to think that they should not have to pay the same equatable share in taxes? In other words if my neighbor happens to work harder than me by working overtime; then he should have to pay more into the system to take care of me when I decided I wasn’t up to working that hard. I know the example is simplified but the point is the same… we should not be putting negative consequence on performance where income is a reflection of performance.

It seems to me that really only fair way to tax is a flat tax which would benefit the government much more anyway by broadening it’s base. However, that still leaves the problem or debate that government is bloated and needs to reign in spending and entitlements.

At one point, the wealthiest 2% were taxed upwards of 90% of their income— and we still had economic growth.

In fact, this period was one of the longest periods of expansion—and it occurred post WWII. BUT….there were also fewer loopholes. The conservative Icon, Ronald Reagan, lowered taxes to 28% for the top tier wealthy—_while closing loopholes_. He knew government of the appropriate size needed to be funded.

Warren Buffet is on the money—Raise the tax rate for the wealthy AND close the loopholes for them (and for big business). Cut Tax Incentives and other Government subsidies for companies (like the Oil Industry) who actually post massive profits.

All of this would go a very long way to achieving a number of goals, including fixing the budget, fixing the deficit, raising our credit rating back up and actually paying for services without borrowing more money.

Share & Socialize

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

Dzhokar Tsarnaev deserves due process?

36 votes, 4 comments