Loading 3 Votes - +

US Admits to Cyber Attack Against Iran

As per usual, “anonymous” officials have made public particularly damning statements about the United States’ and Israel’s involvement in the cyber attacks against the Iranian nuclear program . Reverse engineers around the globe have speculated about the involvement of the two nations in both Stuxnet and Duqu, but there has never been any proof positive towards either other than coincidental political goals. New York Times’ article Obama Order Sped Up Wave of Cyberattacks Against Iran basically lays out an affirmation the program began under the Bush Administration but was continued and ramped up under the Obama Administration as an alternative solution to derailing the Iranian nuclear weapons program in lieu of a pre-emptive military strike by the Israelis. Considering the stance America recently took on what it considers acts of war in the cyber domain, it’s particularly disturbing the officials would admit to performing those very acts against an adversary. Naturally, the “anonymous” officials won’t face a lifetime in prison for such a breach of national security, a punishment reserved for everyone else (such as Bradley Manning).

Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:

Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:
0 Votes  - +
At least we know now. by Occams

Clearly, we need more Wikileaks, and it is good to see that the harsh treatment of Bradley Manning has not prevented other brave people with a conscience coming forward to tell us what we need to know.

Does anyone else share my distaste for these war fighting methods that do not involve any actual fighting? UAVs and cyber attacks may be effective, and safe for our troops, but it is hard to avoid the charge that they are cowardly and dishonourable.

At the very least we should tone down our rhetoric about our enemies being like that.

Share & Socialize

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

Dzhokar Tsarnaev deserves due process?

35 votes, 4 comments