UN Arms Treaty Possibly Affecting US Gun Owners
Not long after President Obama was elected, many Americans began a mad scramble to purchase firearms and ammunition with the expectation he was going to crack down hard on the gun control. Thus far, that particular lane of legislation has remained relatively quiet from the White House. An interesting political twist in the foreign policy arena may finally bring that flag to bear. The United Nations is hammering away at the Arms Trade Treaty, a measure designed on its face to control the availability of weapons to crime syndicates and terrorists. However, the small arms covered by the treaty and the notion of a global firearm registry extend bureaucratic implications towards private gun ownership in the United States (if ratified). There are further large scale implications as well in ratifying the treaty such that nation states would be in violation for providing arms and defenses to other countries or factions (such as Taiwan) faced with less than nobly intended foreign neighbors. But by and large, as the world’s preeminent clearinghouse for private firearm ownership, Americans are concerned with how foreign pressure may impact their present legal right to own – especially when Iran is given an important role in policing the practical application of the treaty.
Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:
- Involvement in Libya, by VnutZ about 2 years ago
- Generals and Presidents, by VnutZ almost 3 years ago
- North Korea Ousts Japan From Nuclear Talks, by VnutZ over 4 years ago
- China Retracts Censorship Promise, by VnutZ almost 5 years ago


Print Friendly
Write an Article
Typical NRA Fear-mongering by Occams
UN Treaties have no legal power in any country. Each administration that signs the treaty must implement it in laws in their own country. So, there is no way that this move represents UN control over American citizens Constitutional rights.
If the US congress chooses to ratify the treaty, then it will mean restrictions in the trade of weapons to other countries, and that in my opinion would be a very good thing.
Iran has been active in the discussions leading to this treaty proposal. So what? This is normal. Iran maintains a very high profile in all UN Organisation meetings these days. That is what you do if you are paranoid about the world hating you, or rather that should be : if you are correct about the world hating you. Other UN member nations have become quite adept at handling provocative interventions from Iran, so there is no serious danger of it having an adverse impact on this important treaty.The only Americans affected will be criminal arms dealers, and they have no Constitutional protection.