Loading 4 Votes - +

The Pentagon and Slave Labor in U.S. Prisons

Most of us seem to be happy for felons to have a miserable time in Prison, but is it OK for them to be used as slaves to make other Americans rich? Sure, it is a good idea to make them earn their keep and not be on a holiday paid for by the tax payers. But!!

Is it acceptable to suspend all the normal industrial safety requirements in relation to people who are being compulsorily kept in our care. There is only one reason why this is being done: because it is cheaper that way.

It is in the nature of the beast that sometimes capitalism gets out of control and citizens have to stand up to it and demand to be treated reasonably. Our prisoners are in no position to do that, so this can be exploited by the unethical people who run many of our major corporations.

When a felon is sentenced to a term in prison he is being punished by society by loss of that most precious thing for a US citizen: Liberty. He is not being sentenced to become the sex bitch of an ex drug lord or the slave of a corporate-owning billionaire with defense contracts.

This recent article by Sarah Flounders indicates that Prisoners earning 23 cents an hour in U.S. federal prisons are manufacturing high-tech electronic components for Patriot Advanced Capability 3 missiles, launchers for TOW (Tube-launched, Optically tracked, Wire-guided) anti-tank missiles, and other guided missile systems.
Prison labor — with no union protection, overtime pay, vacation days, pensions, benefits, health and safety protection, or Social Security withholding — also makes complex components for McDonnell Douglas/Boeing’s F-15 fighter aircraft, the General Dynamics/Lockheed Martin F-16, and Bell/Textron’s Cobra helicopter. Prison labor produces night-vision goggles, body armor, camouflage uniforms, radio and communication devices, and lighting systems and components for 30-mm to 300-mm battleship anti-aircraft guns, along with land mine sweepers and electro-optical equipment for the BAE Systems Bradley Fighting Vehicle’s laser rangefinder. Prisoners recycle toxic electronic equipment and overhaul military vehicles.

Labor in federal prisons is contracted out by UNICOR, previously known as Federal Prison Industries, a quasi-public, for-profit corporation run by the Bureau of Prisons. In 14 prison factories, more than 3,000 prisoners manufacture electronic equipment for land, sea and airborne communication. UNICOR is now the U.S. government’s 39th largest contractor, with 110 factories at 79 federal penitentiaries.

The majority of UNICOR’s products and services are on contract to orders from the Department of Defense. Giant multinational corporations purchase parts assembled at some of the lowest labor rates in the world, then resell the finished weapons components at the highest rates of profit. For example, Lockheed Martin and Raytheon Corporation subcontract components, then assemble and sell advanced weapons systems to the Pentagon.
_The prison work is often dangerous, toxic and unprotected. At FCC Victorville, a federal prison located at an old U.S. airbase, prisoners clean, overhaul and reassemble tanks and military vehicles returned from combat and coated in toxic spent ammunition, depleted uranium dust and chemicals.

A federal lawsuit by prisoners, food service workers and family members at FCI Marianna, a minimum security women’s prison in Florida, cited that toxic dust containing lead, cadmium, mercury and arsenic poisoned those who worked at UNICOR’s computer and electronic recycling factory. Prisoners there worked covered in dust, without safety equipment, protective gear, air filtration or masks. The suit explained that the toxic dust caused severe damage to nervous and reproductive systems, lung damage, bone disease, kidney failure, blood clots, cancers, anxiety, headaches, fatigue, memory lapses, skin lesions, and circulatory and respiratory problems. This is one of eight federal prison recycling facilities — employing 1,200 prisoners — run by UNICOR. After years of complaints the Justice Department’s Office of the Inspector General and the Federal Occupational Health Service concurred in October 2008 that UNICOR has jeopardized the lives and safety of untold numbers of prisoners and staff. (Prison Legal News, Feb. 17, 2009

The U.S. imprisons more people per capita than any country in the world. With less than 5 percent of the world population, the U.S. imprisons more than 25 percent of all people imprisoned in the world.

There are more than 2.3 million prisoners in federal, state and local prisons in the U.S. Twice as many people are under probation and parole. Many tens of thousands of other prisoners include undocumented immigrants facing deportation, prisoners awaiting sentencing and youthful offenders in categories considered reform or detention.

The racism that pervades every aspect of life in capitalist society — from jobs, income and housing to education and opportunity — is most brutally reflected by who is caught up in the U.S. prison system.
Can we still bleat about human rights and the uncompetitiveness of Chinese workers when our major corporations will stoop so low?

What do the nerds think?

Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:

Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:

I think while incarcerated – prisoners ought not have any rights other than to not be beaten. You get a cot. You get a toilet. You get some sunlight. You get a meal or two.

prisoners ought not have any rights other than to not be beaten. You get a cot. You get a toilet. You get some sunlight. You get a meal or two.

A popular view since the Bronze Age, and one that has resulted in many atrocious disease ridden hell holes. But we have moved on in our civilization since then.

Before leaving aside as irrelevant the imperfections in our justice system that results in many people who are not guilty receiving such sentences, consider this paper from the LAW profession that puts the error rate in capital cases at 68 percent using the solid evidence of appeal court statistics.

Yours is the kind of thinking that gave us the 18th century prison hulks on the Thames, Russian gulags, and Andersonville in the Civil War. On the up-side it also gave us Australia! – and assisted the early American colonies.

I think that how we treat these people is a strong reflection of who we are. I am not a Christian, but I wonder how they can rationalise such treatment in view of Jesus teachings about relations with our fellow man. Prisoners are the responsibility of the state: i.e. us all. We are all degraded if we allow atrocities to be committed against people for whom we are responsible. I don’t want that on my conscience.

There’s no reason a prisoner should have a better life than a deployed Soldier.

There’s no reason a prisoner should have a better life than a deployed Soldier.

Yes there is! Because the two things are totally unrelated. The soldier is serving his country in a war zone where risk is part of the job he signed up for. Those risks are largely uncontrollable by us citizens, and are not our responsibility
The prisoner is sentenced to detention in a public institution. To say that his conditions should be similar to a soldier in a war zone is simply ridiculous.

No one should have to endure what a soldier experiences, but we can’t do much about that. We can ensure that our prisons do not resemble a war zone.

To say that his conditions should be similar to a soldier in a war zone is simply ridiculous.

Nobody said the prisoners were going to be shot at or crowded together like an Iraqi prison. Prisoners shouldn’t get cable TV. Prisoners shouldn’t get workout facilities. Prisoners shouldn’t get higher education. Prisoners shouldn’t get any meal beyond subsistence calories. Prisoners shouldn’t have their own private cell. Prisoners shouldn’t get social time.

Prison isn’t shouldn’t be a place of privilege. Committing crimes against the established laws of your country shouldn’t mean you get afforded the amenities of a good life.

I would concede there are two classes of prisoner. The hardcore life / death row prisoners should be treated as above. Somebody in for say … less than 5 (just an example for differentiation) could be described as somebody for rehabilitation in which an entirely different sort of setup could be made. But if you’re not in the rehab program … f*ck ’em.

1 Vote  - +
Home of the Slave. by Occams

Prisoners shouldn’t get cable TV. Prisoners shouldn’t get workout facilities. Prisoners shouldn’t get higher education. Prisoners shouldn’t get any meal beyond subsistence calories. Prisoners shouldn’t have their own private cell. Prisoners shouldn’t get social time.

Well, the issue raised here is: should prisoners be force tod work in dangerous conditions such as where they can be poisoned by having to work with hazardous materials without any of the normal safeguards that are required by law in a non-prison work place? Should business that compete for defence contracts gain an unfair competitive advantage by being allowed to treat their workers in this way? Industrial safety measures are part of the costs of production for all firms. The health recovery costs of these people will be on the public purse, and so it should be because it happened in our care. The way to mitigate that risk is to force these prison contractors to follow normal industrial safety practices.
This is the same as saying that we do not care about the health and safety of people because they are our prisoners. What is the legal basis for this?
Personally I still find slavery very distasteful. With 2 million prisoners in the USA today we probably have more slaves in the Land of the Free than we did in the 1850s.

Prisoners shouldn’t get cable TV … workout facilities … higher education … any meal beyond subsistence calories … [a] private cell … social time.

A classmate of my wife was a prison guard, and he’d argue that those are all safety measures for the guards. Consider a prison as a small, extremely regimented, insular society with a highly oppressive “noble class”. Once you do that, you can see clearly that they’re highly volatile places; even the minimum security prisons fall into this category. So, the “privileges” are a way of pacifying the populace while maintaining order. Without those, there would be no incentive for good behavior, and that is when things get very, very bad.

Yes, I can see that this would be a good analogy, and privileges like those luxuries no doubt provide a good disciplinary tool. But protection from having your health destroyed by an employer neglecting occupational health and safety rules is not a privilege for prisoners (although it might be for prison industries).
My main point is that there is no legal provision for an exemption from the law on this for prison industrie. The cases mentioned in the reference article shows that the courts agree with me.

This is not far removed from the NAZI Dr Engles medical experiments on Jewish prisoners because the notion that their lives have no value is the same for both.

The next step should be to prosecute the offending prison officials and employers, and hopefully put the guilty in a contaminated prison factory as slaves where they can reflect on their former attitude to OH&S.

Why are prisoners doing this work for a mere pittance; when there are numerous businesses who could and would do the work on the outside? Why is this allowed to even exist? It’s a completely unfair practice; and doesn’t allow American Manufacturers to compete on a level playing field.

Of course..in my home state, the lifers made license plates for 4 or 5 states—and could make hundreds of dollars a month doing this, enabling them to buy TV’s, stereo’s etc.. No ‘first hand’ knowledge of this fact, however, other than friends who worked in the Indiana DOC and were pretty knowledgeable about how things worked out monetarily for the ‘Offenders’; as they used to call them there. ‘Prisoner’ or ‘Inmate’ is a psychologically damaging term…LOL

When a felon is sentenced to a term in prison he is being punished by society by loss of that most precious thing for a US citizen: Liberty.

Seems to me you hit the critical point right there.

When we take away a prisoner’s “liberty”, what that means is we take away his right to decide what to do with himself. A free man gets to choose for himself how he spends his time — working to earn a paycheck, travelling, whatever his resources allow. That’s precisely what a prisoner has lost.

Now, having taken it from him, it means that we are free to decide how he uses that time. We have an ethical responsibility to treat them humanely, so it’s wrong to expose them to toxic chemicals or that sort of thing, but it’s not at all wrong to put them to work (and ethics require that we grant them a reasonable amount of “personal” time for psychological reasons). They needn’t receive any compensation for their work.

I think there’s a legitimate question as to who should receive the benefits of their labor — it shouldn’t simply be given away to some contractor, it should accrue to the government. The examples you listed seem to suggest that’s happening — the prisoners building military gear end up reducing the production costs for the prime contractor, which (presumably) reduces the cost to the government of the materiel.

There’s a separate issue we, as a society, have to bear in mind. By granting the fruits of prison labor to the government, we create an incentive to increase that pool — a bad government would tend to increase the length of sentences and to criminalize otherwise harmless behavior. It’s an easy way to increase revenues without raising taxes.

We seem to already have something of a problem along those lines. As you point out, our prison population is absurdly high compared to other countries. I’m given to understand that a great deal of it is because of the failed “war on drugs”.

Share & Socialize

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

Dzhokar Tsarnaev deserves due process?

33 votes, 4 comments