1 Nerd-It - +

Standard Telephone Tax Refund vs Calculated Actual Cost of Federal Excise Tax

Page_white_text an academic article by Brandon U. Hansen (Brandon), published on 14 February 2007
tagged as economics, excise tax, and telephone tax
other nerds have left 15 comments below

Obligatory disclaimer: I am not a certified anything (at least with respect to taxes), so any and all content and advice contained in this article is for informational use only.

The Telephone Tax Refund is available for the first time on 2006 returns (filed in 2007).1 It is described by the IRS as a "one-time payment available on your 2006 federal income tax return, designed to refund previously collected federal excise taxes on long-distance or bundled service. It is available to anyone who paid such taxes on landline, wireless, or Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) service."2 The purposes of this Federal Excise Tax (FET) are interesting in and of themselves,3 but perhaps the more immediately important matter is how to best take advantage of this refund on your personal return. This article explores my experience in so doing.

Telephone Tax Return Options

Those wishing to take advantage of the Telephone Tax Refund have the option of either filling out and filing Form 8913, Credit for Federal Telephone Excise Tax Paid4 or requesting a "standard" refund amount. This standard refund ranges from $30 to $60 based on the number of exemptions claimed on the return: $30 for one exemption, $40 for 2, $50 for 3, and $60 for four or more. The difference between the options is obviously one of convenience; while filling out the form involves looking up phone bills from March of 2003 to July 2006,5 taking the standard refund only requires one line to be filled in on the appropriate 1040 Form.6

Being Lazy Might Cost You

The issue is, then, is filling out the form worth the effort? The short answer is: Probably. Of course, this depends on the individual case, but my experience shows that filling out the form more than quadrupled my refund over the standard $40 I would have received.

So, how do you know if calculating your actual cost is worth it for you before actually doing all of the work? It’s easy. Simply pull out a typical bill within the applicable time period (March 2003 through July 2006) and identify all Federal Excise Tax charges. These should be listed as a line item for each phone line usually in a section entitled something like "Government Fees & Taxes."

4_article_70_thumb_excise_tax_line_item

Figure 1. Example of a listing of the Federal Excise Tax on a typical phone bill.

Next, total all of these Federal Excise Taxes from your sample bill and multiply them by the number of months in the applicable period, which is 41. For example, if your taxes total around $3.15 per month, multiplying this across the 41 month span comes to almost $130. Figure 2 provides a quick way to determine how much taxes would need to be on your average monthly bill to beat out the standard refund. The rest of this article will detail what to do if the potential increase in refund by taking the "form way" seems worth your while.

4_article_70_thumb_refund_comparison

Figure 2. Comparison of the standard refund to the actual cost by the amount paid on the average month.

Gathering Past Bill Information

While it would be great if the data collected from the sample bill could just be filled in for every month, the fact is that the taxed amount very likely changed from month to month depending on a number of factors, including:

  • if you added or removed lines,
  • if your service provider started the tax after March 2003 or discontinued it before July 2006,
  • if you changes service plans,
  • or if you were reimbursed for the tax.

In my case, I started with two lines, added two lines (of which for one I was being reimbursed), and noticed that my provider "discontinued billing for the FET on all billing statements issued after June 6th, 2006"7 (although cross-checking this with my bills revealed the last month I was actually charged was May 2006). Additionally, I changed service plans at one point and was informed by Cingular over the phone that I was not charged the tax until January of 2004.

Even with all of these complications, gathering past bill information is much easier now that most phone companies allow access via the Internet. I was able to easily locate bills on my phone provider’s site back to July 2005, but when I called the provider for information on bills further back, I met with resistance. You may need to get creative by speaking to managers, calling more than once to get information on a couple of bills each time, etc. It is important to note, however, that a 41 month record of your bills isn’t required. As stated by the IRS, "You need not have bills and records covering the entire period, but you must have records adequate to support the refund amount you are requesting."8

In the end, I pieced together what I thought was a very accurate summary of what I paid in Federal Excise Taxes. A simple spreadsheet allowed me to total my costs. Notice that the values for which I was reimbursed are grayed out and not included in the totals, as those should be claimed by the person who reimbursed me.9

4_article_70_thumb_tax_sum

Table 1. Summation of my Federal Excise Taxes requested on my 2007 tax return.

Bundled Service and Interest

Most of you are probably wondering why my table shows a total of $75 while I previously claimed a refund of over $160. The reason for this, is two fold: "bundled service" and interest.

Interest is applied to the previously paid taxes at a rate of 3%. Instructions for calculating it is included on the form if you’re filling out a hard copy, and it is done automatically if using tax software.10

Bundled service is defined by the IRS as, "local and long-distance service provided under a plan that does not separately list the charge for local service. Bundled service includes, for example, phone plans that provide both local and long-distance service for either a flat monthly fee or a charge that varies with the time for which the service is used."11 Many cell phone and VoIP services qualify, and this results in a near doubling of the refund amount, as seen in the following excerpt from Form 8913 as filled out by TurboTax12 using my information from Table 1.

4_article_70_thumb_form_excerpt

Figure 3. Excerpt from Form 8913 as filled out by TurboTax using information from Table 1.

Uncle Sam Is Tricky

The lesson in all of this is, of course, that taking the "hard way" could result in a refund much larger than the "easy way" offered by the government. So, although Uncle Sam may try his best to tell you all of the data that is behind the standard amount,13 don’t let him trick you. You’re entitled to make your own little stand for justice by demanding the return of all of the money charged without cause.

Notes

1 "Funding the Spanish American War." OmniNerd.com. Accessed February 2007 from http://www.omninerd.com/2006/12/07/news/1046.

2 "Telephone Tax Refund Questions and Answers." IRS.gov. Accessed February 2007 from http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=161506,00.html.

3 Ibid., "Why is the government refunding these taxes?"

4 "Form 8913: Credit for Federal Telephone Excise Tax Pain." Accessed February 2007 from http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f8913.pdf (PDF).

5 Questions and Answers. "How do I determine how much federal excise tax I have paid on my long-distance service?"

6 Ibid., "What forms do I file to request the refund?"

7 "What is the Federal Excise Tax (FET) Refund?" Cingular Answer Center. Cingular Wireless. Accessed February 2007 from http://supportcingular.atgnow.com/cng/resultDisplay.do?page=http%3A%2F%2F supportcingular.atgnow.com%2Fcng%2Ftutorials%2FKB76417.html&result=4& responseid=0ad7759197425ba4%3A1381e7%3A11095bdeb65%3A-39da&groupid=1& contextid=23004%3A1076.1202&clusterName=CingularCluster&doctype=1000& excerpt=The+standard+refund+amount+varies+between+%2430+and+%2460%2C+ based+on+the+total+number+of+exemptions+claimed+on+the+2006+tax+return .#Goto1076. Search the Answer Center for "telephone tax" to find the referenced answer.

8 Ibid., "I only have records covering part of the 41-month period. Can I still request a telephone tax refund, based on the records I have?"

9 Clayton, if you’re reading this, that means you!

10 Ibid., "How do I decide if it’s better for me to use the actual or take the standard amount?"

11 Questions and Answers. "One-Time Tax Refund Available to Long-Distance Telephone Customers." IRS.gov. Accessed February 2007 from http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=165629,00.html.

12 "TurboTax Online Delux Deduction Maximizer." ’’ Accessed February 2007 from http://turbotax.intuit.com/?cid=ppc_gg_b_stan_ts-ts+btt+nm&priorityCode=4138500000.

13 Questions and Answers. "How did the government come up with the standard amounts?"

Information This article was edited after publication by the author on 11 Dec 2008. View changes.
Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:

Thanks for the assessment — I was wondering how much it would come out to for some people. Out of curiosity I grabbed one of my paper statements (yup, I have 7 years worth of them) during the time the tax was in effect and guesstimated my calculated refund amount was going to be less than the standard value, so I’m opting for the standard one.

On the flip side, it could be said that the people who own enough bundles or lines to rack up the larger-than-standard refund probably make enough that their time to calculate the correct value isn’t worth the final refund. That limit would obviously vary pending on the person and the person’s evaluation of what their time is worth.

Granted, I of all people know that sometimes the principle of the issue is worth more than any dollar value of my time :)

According to the IRS, many taxpayers are not even claiming the standard deduction let alone going to the extra work to itemize it. From a recent article:

More than a third of early tax return filers are not requesting the one-time telephone tax refund entitling them to at least $30, the Internal Revenue Service said.
bq. The agency said that in addition to more than one-third of early filers using Forms 1040, 1040A and others not requesting the refund, lower income people using Form 1040EZ-T are failing to show a refund amount on Line 1a.
bq. Others, it said, are requesting refunds based on the entire amount of their phone bills, rather than the 3 percent tax on long-distance and bundled service, or requesting amounts in the hundreds or thousands of dollars.
bq. It advised taxpayers to file electronically because electronic-filing software flags often-overlooked tax breaks. The agency also reminded taxpayers that the break does not apply to the total phone bill or taxes paid on local-only service. Taxpayers are urged to stay away from tax preparers claiming they can get hundreds of dollars or more back.

It’s interesting to note that they suggest avoiding tax preparers that can get hundreds back. Based on your analysis, I’d say it is possible that many people could get hundreds back.

I received the following inquiry via email:

I was reading over your article and in attempt to understand the difference between the "long distance" column and "bundle" column, I used all your numbers to do the calculations. My main confusion is about the long distance + bundle options. If I have a cell phone national plan, then I would think it is technically a bundle package. But your article makes it sound like both a long distance and bundle option, which effectively doubles my refund.

I don’t exactly understand how it all works, either. As I went through the TurboTax steps, it asked me to fill in what I had paid in FET and then asked if the payments had gone towards bundled service. As a cell phone national plan is specifically identified as qualifying as a "bundled" service, I selected yes. Then, I scanned the resulting documentation which TurboTax automatically generates and found the form to be as you see it in Figure 3.

And besides that main confusion above, I don’t understand your form 8913. I understand column C, it is the total based off all non gray cells with respect to their groups. What I do not understand is column b. It seems as if initially, all the columns ($3, 5, 5, 5, and so on) are from just your phone line #1. But once it hits $11, it seems to be factoring in phone line #4, which you grayed out because you were reimbursed. What happened there?

I noticed the discrepancy as well, and double-checked my numbers to be sure I hadn’t included anything extra. I hadn’t, and so the only explanation I could come up with is the way the system rounds the refund amounts. Additionally, I only input one set of values, not one set for "long distance" and one set for "bundled" service. Somehow, though, TurboTax came up with different numbers in columns B and C – again, the only explanation for which I could determine being rounding (i.e., maybe the rounding rules are different for the two columns, or maybe only a percentage of column B applies to column C?).

My main concern is if I can claim my cell phone national plan on both column b and c, or just c. It seems a little strange to claim both because I was just charged the tax once.

You’re correct it should only be claimed once if it was only paid once. However, there seems to be some nuance in the system that allows bundled service to go in both columns, effectively bumping up your refund.

If you are doing the calculations by hand, I suggest giving the instructions a careful look to see if you can determine what step leads to this. If you can’t identify one and your potential tax increase would outweigh the cost of something like TurboTax, then I suggest using it.

0 Nerd-Its - +
Time Burden - 14 hours? by tomtolman :: NR5

MyInvestmentBlog.com points out that the IRS has estimated the time burden to fill out Form 8913 to claim the extra taxes as 13 hours and 37 minutes. Brandon, how long do you estimate that it took to gather the records and fill out the form? Of course you also wrote an article about it so it may be difficult for you to separate that time out. Anyone else claim the extra taxes? How long did it take you?

One common mistake people make is adding up the Federal tax as well as the Federal fees on their bills. The fees are NOT being refunded. For more information on what to look for in the bills, see http://consumernotes.blogspot.com/.

It is definitely worth taking a few minutes to look through old bills to add the tax up. Instead of the $30 standard claim, I got $170.

OmniNerd Article Propagation

The Showcase

Nerd-Its   Nerd Trends   Last Ten  

  1. RE: Please read the Book of Mormon! // Jake is way off base in God before Country in the Military
  2. RE: IP Scheme in Apple Airport Extreme and Cisco WRVS4400N Review
  3. RE: IP Scheme in Apple Airport Extreme and Cisco WRVS4400N Review
  4. RE: IP Scheme in Apple Airport Extreme and Cisco WRVS4400N Review
  5. IP Scheme in Apple Airport Extreme and Cisco WRVS4400N Review
  6. RE: nerdy? in God before Country in the Military
  7. Should'nt matter in NFL Play Reviews and Slow Motion Technology
  8. nerdy? in God before Country in the Military
  9. RE: Now it's, "Please watch Expelled"? in God before Country in the Military
  10. RE: Please read the Book of Mormon! // Jake is way off base in God before Country in the Military

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

Legalizing medical marijuana?

21 votes, 1 comment