an academic
article
by Images of four of the author’s most recent oil paintings with descriptions of their size and media, as well as some behind the scenes information on their inspiration. | 2005-09-26 16:20:39 | 319 |Horizontal Blood
I was in the middle of this painting when my wife, Kari, commented that it looked like "dripping blood." This ad hoc name was later modified when I decided I liked the finished product better rotated 90 degrees from the position in which it was painted.
This painting also has a little extra personality that may not be obvious. Soon after finishing the painting, I was contemplating the "official orientation" and decided to seek Kari’s thoughts. While excitedly showing her one view and then rotating the painting to the next, the painting slipped from my hands and fell face-down towards our beige carpet. At the last moment, I kicked up the corner of the painting and it flipped onto its side. A little paint still got on the couch and the carpet, but the painting was saved – albeit with a nice toenail scrape on the left edge towards the top (i.e., the personality I mentioned earlier).
|
|||
|
Fiesta Corn
Each "section" of this painting was painted using a different brush stroke. The painting earned its name while it was at an unfinished stage in which the general color scheme screamed Mexican (or fiesta) corn.1 I ended up making some changes that significantly lessened the name’s appropriateness, but it stuck nonetheless.
|
|||
|
I Hate Settlers
I was inspired to paint this after horribly losing a game of Settlers of Catan.2 Completely unintentionally, the colors used ended up paralleling the colors on the tiles used in the board game. The name isn’t entirely accurate as I do not hate settlers, but the temporary disdain for the game made this piece possible.
|
|||
|
Dad’s Office
This smaller piece was painted as a gift for my father. As his office is his preferred hang-out, it was designed to be displayed on his desk. However, he cancelled his visit to Houston at the last minute and I have not had another opportunity to give him the gift. Maybe after seeing it in this venue he will reschedule!
On an artsier note, this was the first time I used layers of oil paint. The streaks of yellow are painted with thinned oil paint on top of semi-dried layers of thicker paint.3,4
|
|||
|
1 Fiesta corn looks like this: http://www.pcboriginals.com/user/Fiesta%20corn.jpg and is made like this: http://southernfood.about.com/od/cornrecipes/r/bl30207e.htm.
2 Highly recommended. Can be purchased here: ___http://www.unclesgames.com/product_info.php?ref=3&products_id=1938&affiliate_banner_id=1___.
3 This technique is commonly known as painting fat over lean. More information is available here: http://painting.about.com/cs/oils/a/fatoverlean.htm.
4 Gicleé prints of the paintings displayed herein are available from the author’s website: http://www.artbyhansen.com. Some originals are also available.
Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:
- Twitpics of Disaster in Haiti, by AnonBCA 2 months ago
- Modern Art - A Mother's Deception, by VnutZ over 2 years ago
- Banksy Artwork to Be Treated as Graffiti, by spanner over 2 years ago
Print Friendly
Write an Article
Settlers... by Rhodizzle :: NR5 :: Show
Judging by the colors, that was a pretty interesting settlers layout. Have you heard of the much vaunted "Sheep strategy?"
Sleepy Clown by markmcb :: NR7 :: Show
I proposed a new name for the third painting: Sleepy Clown.
A quick 90 degree rotation to the right will quickly reveal the true subject of this work! I’m certain the image is displayed as it is only because the subject was out all night clowning around prior to its creation. :-)
Candy for the Eye by kflgilbert :: NR2 :: Show
Brandon, you have created some very unique and thought provoking artwork. I do love the vibrant colors and visible brushstrokes. In this batch, I am partial to Horizontal Blood, although I am not particularly fond of the title of the piece. It is alive with subtle movement…a radiant energy. It reminds me of the play of shadow and light found in the hollows of the Appalachians. A fall sunset with its ethereal shadows, a haunting of trees, a wrestling of fear, an aroma lifting. Thank you for the "eye candy".
my 2 cents about "good" art by bradsmith :: NR5 :: Show
Some questions were posed in this thread that asked what constitutes "good". I think an intelligent discussion could be centered around this core question, what makes a great artist?
On the subjective level, I think that art constitutes any thing that brings some degree of emotion to its audience. Whether one subjectively classifies one piece as "good" or not, ultimately depends on 1) the degree to which said emotion is conveyed, and 2) whether that emotion is enjoyable to the audience. Both criteria are subjective and depend heavily on the audience. The degree to which emotion is conveyed however, is often easier to quantify or perhaps classify and distinguish. I think this is often what art critics focus on.
Perhaps now we should move on to what constitutes a "good artist". The subject matter of the pieces, i.e. the emotional tone, isn’t what is important in this classification. What is important is the way in which the artist seeks to convey the emotion. Critics often cite the originality of a piece. Does the artist seek an unique medium through which the emotion is transferred? This shows that the artist is seeking out more difficult (or unconventional) media or techniques through which to convey an emotion. When I hear people in a gallery speak of a "powerful piece" this is what often comes to mind. Sure they are merely commenting on the emotion that they are perceiving, but something about the piece may be amplifying the emotion. When an artist learns to use a particular media or technique (not subject) to amplify the emotional effect, that is something unique. This is the core of modern art, which is the most criticized period of art. Sure a line is a line, but if an artist can convey something (again it’s subjective) through the use of a single line, that may be something. The problem with modern art, is that it is easy to take it too far.
I am a big fan of art history. I think if the history of art is better understood, it makes viewing art more enjoyable. Yes, many people who view "art" often have an aura of elitism, but that doesn’t mean art can’t be enjoyed. If you know the history of Picasso, then you can appreciate his periods. And knowing is half the battle.
One last thought about art. In my opinion, the best painters (and artists) are those who first mastered portraits. If you study art history you can see a progression from first mimicking nature, to ultimately trying to conceptualize aspects of nature in more simple forms. If you take Picasso for example. He painted portraits and became skilled. THEN he began to study aspects of art. He conceptualized things. Instead of painting a traditional portrait he sought to do so from more than one angle ushering in cubism. And so on. He sought different ways to portray emotion using the same subject moving more towards the abstract. An abstract painting is only truly meaningful (in my opinion) if it is an exercise in perspective and technique. I’m not saying that abstract painting or artists aren’t meaningful…but I don’t think a "great artist" can emerge if he/she isn’t using the abstract art as exercises technique. I don’t think you can go backwards from abstract to a portrait and have the same depth in your work. Anyone can make art, but it does take skill to be a great artist.