Loading 6 Votes - +

Nuclear War: Inevitable

I just listened to a sound bite of a KGO correspondent in a discussion with Ted Sorenson, President John F. Kennedy’s Special Counsel & Adviser when he was in the White House. A lot of disturbing facts were brought up centering on how curiously close we’ve come to nuclear war in the past. This includes the Cuban missile Crisis, and the conflict with th Soviet Union.

There was one circumstance Mr. Sorenson mentioned where a Soviet submarine equipped with a "nuclear missile" (which at the time had been unheard of) was underneath a fleet of US carriers. The entire Soviet crew was in agreement the sub should strike with the missile, and eventually convinced the captain. The only thing that kept them from acting was a command from a Soviet politician who happened to be on the sub. He insisted on getting clearance, which, at the time, was an impossibility because they were submerged.

There was another one where correspondence about whether or not to strike was trusted in the responsibility of a random Western Union worker in the Soviet Union on a bike, going back and forth from the Embassy to to the government office.

How close are we to nuclear war? Have I been overly cynical all these years, or am I justified in making some "mystic" rationalizations / deductions about nuclear fallout? It has been proven countless times America (as a whole) is lot less prepared for conflicts of this magnitude then the media leads us to believe. What are the factors keeping us from nuclear war now?

Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:

Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:
2 Votes  - +
World Condemnation by gnifyus

In the recent past it has probably been only diplomacy and the threat of total world condemnation that may be keeping the threat of nuclear conflict at bay. In a 2002 PBS interview between Jim Lehrer and Colin Powell, the former Secretary of State makes this clear when talking about the tensions between India and Pakistan at the time:

JIM LEHRER: If there is, in fact, a conflict, how likely is it that it would eventually lead to the use of nuclear weapons by these two countries?

COLIN POWELL: I can’t answer that question, but I can say this. In my conversations with both sides, and especially with the Pakistani side, I have made it clear that this really can’t be in anyone’s mind. I mean, the thought of a nuclear conflict in the year 2002, with what that would mean with respect to loss of life, what that would mean with respect to the condemnation — the worldwide condemnation – that would come down on whatever nation chose to take that course of action, would be such that I can see very little military, political or any other kind of justification for the use of nuclear weapons. Nuclear weapons in this day and age may serve some deterrent effect, and so be it, but to think of using them as just another weapon in what might start out as a conventional conflict in this day and age seems to me to be something that no side should be contemplating.

3 Votes  - +
Inevitably Unknown by VnutZ

On a tangentially parallel vein (mathematics majors commence twitching now), the Men In Black describe the continuous threat of imminent death best

Jay: Man, we ain’t got time for this cover-up bullshit! I don’t know whether or not you’ve forgotten, but there’s an Arquillian Battle Cruiser that’s about to…
Kay: There’s always an Arquillian Battle Cruiser, or a Corillian Death Ray, or an intergalactic plague that is about to wipe out all life on this miserable little planet, and the only way these people can get on with their happy lives is that they Do… Not… Know about it!

Which really makes you wonder, is ignorance bliss? Sure, there’s a case to be made for being part of the system and doing something about it. But simply being a panic stricken, half-informed couch potato does nothing positive for the situation either.

Share & Socialize

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

Dzhokar Tsarnaev deserves due process?

32 votes, 4 comments