More "Helpful" Search Engines
I’ve run across two new search engines recently, both of which share a new take on Internet searching: fewer, but more useful results.
The first is Bing, the new search engine from Microsoft. Although often caught playing catch up, some say Microsoft may actually have something that does the competition “one better” here. Why? Because it makes assumptions and provides slimmed-down, allegedly more useful information. For example, searching for a band name provides automatic links to information on tours, lyrics, albums, etc. Or, searching for a city name has links to attractions, travel, hotels, etc. Yes, Google has some of this functionality (and even some Bing doesn’t, like the ability to automatically see showtimes in your area when searching for a movie name), but Bing makes it almost the centerpiece of search—not an afterthought.
The second I found via a previous article on OmniNerd: Wolfram Alpha. I don’t want to re-hash the discussion there, so I’ll just say this site ignores the generic “search engine results” entirely as it attempts to make “the world’s systemmatic knowledge computable.” Search for “population of Africa” and you’ll get graphs, tables and more—without another click.
So, is skipping straight to the presumed data the future of online searching? And if so, could it mean the end of Google’s dominance?
Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:
- Hack Google Chrome OS for Pi, by iluvchiken 4 months ago
- Oracle, Google and the Future of Programming, by Jackson about 1 year ago
- Google Wave: Fantastic or Fail?, by Dereck over 3 years ago
- Cuil vs. Google, by gnifyus almost 5 years ago
This article was edited after publication by the author on 16 Jul 2009.
View changes.


Print Friendly
Write an Article
Validity of your grammer is in question here. by smcbride
So, is this way skipping straight to the presumed data sought the the future of online searching?
I like Wolfram Alpha by gnifyus
Google, Yahoo, Bing. Even Mamma or AlltheWeb, they’re all the same to me, so I wind up using Google out of habit mostly. (Google loves that), by the way.
But WolframAlpha is entirely different. It is not really even for general searching. Instead, you get a whole bunch of “technical information” about what you type in. Try density of iron and it gives you just that info in more formats than you probably wanted.
But type in Michael Jackson and you get absolutely the most boring juice-less info available. All recognizable people are treated equally here.
It seems good for stocks also.
It’s a new and completely different tool that is not trying to compete with the others.