God Particle Discovered
Physicists have been messing around with the standard model since the 1970s by slamming particles into one another to discern the basic building blocks of the universe. While the model described the particles quite well, there was no evidence beyond theoretical prediction about the bosons that influenced the forces between them. The Higgs Boson in particular was of interest to physicists and is often referred to as the God Particle for its theorized purpose in providing mass. This property is, of course, critical for allowing atoms to form and ultimately for “us” to exist, hence the name. The Higgs Boson was actually found in December of 2011 but to avoid an embarrassing declaration of science (faster than light neutrinos?), researchers held onto the news until a definitive five-sigma level of confidence was attained. The discovery was made possible by smashing particles repeatedly in the CERN supercollider revealing evidence of the Higgs Boson with a mass equaling 125 gigaelectron volts (GeV) — about 125 times the mass of a proton. Be prepared for the resurgence of the physics nerd as they steal the cash, chicks and cocaine from the more mainstream geeks and rappers, as according to Princeton physicists – “It’s a triumphant day for fundamental physics. Now some fun begins.”
Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:
- FTL Neutrino Experiment Replicated, by VnutZ over 1 year ago
- Quantum Locking Demonstration, by VnutZ over 1 year ago
- Controversy Over Faster Than Light Neutrinos, by VnutZ over 1 year ago
- Electrons Are Spherical, by VnutZ about 2 years ago
This article was edited after publication by the author on 11 Jul 2012.
View changes.


Print Friendly
Write an Article
I by mathewbelz
I just can say that this is an awesome news for the science in whole, especially physics.
RE: I by scottb
In a way, it’s really not.
See, we expected to find the Higgs boson right where we found it, so we haven’t really learned anything we didn’t already know.
It might have been more awesome to not find the Higgs at 125GeV, but somewhere unexpected — or even to not find it at all. That would force us to find new physics to explain its absence.
RE: I by Occams
Yes, It is exactly how science is supposed to work. Existing knowledge shows a gap; a prediction is made; experiments are devised to test the prediction; the prediction is found to be true. I can’t see any connection with God in this.
I have heard some scientists call it the Goddam Particle because it was so hard to find.
RE: I by scottb
I have heard some scientists call it the Goddam Particle because it was so hard to find.
The guy who originally coined the term “God Particle” said that. The “God Particle” term was something he made up for a book title, and he said he didn’t really like it, but he thought it did convey the importance of the topic, and because “the publisher wouldn’t let us call it the Goddamn Particle, though that might be a more appropriate title, given its villainous nature and the expense it is causing.”
Scientists mostly hate the term. It’s hard enough to explain particle physics to laymen without confusing the issue by bringing in irrelevant nonsense.
RE: I by Occams
I guess the term has some validity for religious cranks because it is the thing that holds everything together. Broadcasters seem to love it.
RE: I by scottb
Science journalists — especially bad ones — love it.
I had to laugh at how many tweets showed up last week saying things like “atheists are eating crow now they’ve discovered the God particle!” in apparent seriousness.
RE: I by Occams
I would no0t be too surprised if some cult started worshipping it.
Think about it! They would have a tremendous competitive advantage because their God has been validated by science: he really is in us and everywhere, and he is the central power in the universe.
Scientists cannot deny His existence or super powers. He is totally non interventionist in the lives of humans but that does not seem to worry most Christians. At at least he holds them together when otherwise they would fall apart.
Perhaps he really is responsible for creating everything.
CERN becomes a great Cathedral and place of pilgrimage, and the atomic scientists there are the high priests.
RE: I by Occams
Heck, I may be onto something here. The Druids were nuclear physicists and Stonehenge was an ancient particle accelerator. Both are big and round. Coincidence? I think not!
RE: I by scottb
I think it misses some elements that Christians find crucial. The Higgs field doesn’t give a shit about us — it doesn’t care who we have sex with, or any other aspect of our behavior. Worse, it doesn’t keep us from dying.
RE: I by Occams
Well, the new cult would not be Christian. It would have nothing much to offer other than a theory of existence, but that would not necessarily be unpalatible to modern people. Imagine there’s no evil….
Consider that the Bosun field is immortal, since matter cannot be destroyed. In that sense the particles that we are made of are also immortal because they continue to exist somewhere else after we die.
I don’t want to invent the theology of a new cult, I merely said that I would not be surprised if someone did, because it would have a better start than most religions. At least the faithful would have to learn some fundamental physics.
RE: I by scottb
Well, the new cult would not be Christian.
I don’t think it’ll be very big. Immortality and a super-father figure are really big selling points.
RE: I by Occams
Maybe it could serve as a religion for nerds and scientists.