Extraterrestrial Life Unlikely
Since the dawn of the scientific age when telescopes revealed the existence of planets other than our own, humankind began asking questions and fantasizing about whether Earth holds the only complex and intelligent life in the universe. All sorts of opinions have been circling around for a long time, and even a simple Google search reveals hundreds of thousands of items on the subject.
Professor Andrew Watson from the University of East Anglia has derived some mathematical models (pdf) in an attempt to show the likelihood that any intelligent life outside our planet is highly improbable. His main point comes from his theory that it took several very difficult evolutionary steps to get us to where we are, and these steps took 4 billion years, only developing intelligent life near the end of Earth’s total habitability range. This range is based on the effects the sun will have as it expands in the next few billion years. These unlikely combinations of events lead Professor Watson to conclude that intelligent life on other planets is extremely unlikely. He states, “At present, Earth is the only example we have of a planet with life. If we learned the planet would be habitable for a set period and that we had evolved early in this period, then even with a sample of one, we’d suspect that evolution from simple to complex and intelligent life was quite likely to occur. By contrast, we now believe that we evolved late in the habitable period, and this suggests that our evolution is rather unlikely. In fact, the timing of events is consistent with it being very rare indeed.”
Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:
- Jet Pack Flight Over Grand Canyon, by VnutZ about 2 years ago
- China Ready for First Space Walk, by Brandon over 4 years ago
- Earth May Be Destroyed After All - Our Bad, by VnutZ about 5 years ago
- Ancient Numbers Theory Puzzle Solved, by gnifyus about 5 years ago


Print Friendly
Write an Article
MC Hawking has "Stupid Whack Degrees" by VnutZ
The Mighty Stephen Hawking thinks otherwise, "Primitive life is very common and intelligent life is fairly rare …. Some would say it has yet to occur on earth." He believes there’s a likelihood of life outside of Earth, just that it’s not anything like we’d expect.
For more good Stephen Hawking fun, check out the Mighty Steven Hawking rap.
Sure there is! by smcbride
There is no new knowledge just old recycled information lost over time, if they didn’t exist, we would not be talking about them! How could we know about something that has no know end. Our knowledge is very limited when it comes to the universe.
What about these guys? by romanizzo
It seems that his thesis is based on the fact that you have to have Earth-like conditions to grow life, and it has to last long enough to achieve the series of unfortunate coincides that leads to intelligent life.
Earth-like conditions are incredibly diverse, though. What about these guys? I’d say that the conditions that they live in are nothing like the conditions that these guys live in. Stretch the mind, professor, stretch the mind. Life can develop lots of places, and where there can be life, there can be intelligent life. With an infinite universe and an infinite timeline…
(lets not let this devolve into an intelligent design discussion)
Hitchhiking through the Galaxy by NomadSoul
The Universe is just too darn big for intelligent life to occur only once—although because it is so big, the chances of actually meeting that other life seems rather slim. Then again, in the Hitchhiker’s series, Douglas Adams suggests that because of the vastness of the cosmos, even a universe full of life-bearing planets would still have an effective population of zero. So, I guess we’re not really here.
This looks pretty meaningless by scottb
I haven’t looked at the PDF, yet (plan to – just wanted to capture my initial reaction) but my guess is that it’s really irrelevant.
From the UEA text…
When we’re wearing our "frequentist" hats in interpreting probabilities, we’d immediately suggest he’s entirely full of shit. He’s estimating the probabilities for these events based on a sample of one. It’s like walking up to a random person on the street, measuring his cholesterol level, and then publishing a paper on human cholesterol levels.
Even if we’re more sensible and tell the frequentists to go stuff it, and break out the Bayesian interpretation, we’re still pretty certain he’s just making up numbers to get the answer he wants. Again, what we know is that it happened once. It could be almost inevitable that any replicator eventually forms cells, which aggregate and specialize, leading to intelligence.
Don't We Already Know This? by gnifyus
It seems that Prof. Watson (and he admits it in his paper) is basing all the evolutionary steps from the emergence of life itself to the existence of intelligent life on the singular and only known experience gained from our earth. What he’s trying to say it seems, is that each major step towards intelligent life had a large chance of not succeeding, making each subsequent step all the more improbable as a whole. He claims his model will work for any system based on rare occurrences when he states (from the paper), "Any other property of organisms that is governed by a sequence of rare, random events could be modeled in the same way. For example, if the evolution of an organism that is able to breathe fluorine gas requires a sequence of rare evolutionary events, the same model could be used to investigate when in the history of their planets such organisms tend to appear, in the rare cases that they ever do.‘’
He is also assuming that each habitable planet has a window of about 5-6 billion earth years in which to evolve intelligent life, and since ours took towards the end of this time to develop intelligence, the other ones would probably take that long also (and maybe never make it). He does have a point in this; if intelligent life evolved in the first 500 million years, we might expect that many more planets would contain intelligent life. But, how do we know without having any nearby examples that earth isn’t just on the "edge" of what it take to develop intelligent life, and that’s what made it take so long?
Overall, I guess he’s telling us something we already know, that life intelligence and the consciousness to realize those facts are, in our present experience, rare phenomena however they eventually arrived.