Employers Demanding Access to Private Accounts
It’s relatively old news that employers do their research on interviewed candidates. They’ve done Google searches on them and checked them out on social networking sites like FaceBook. Some people finally jumped on the privacy bandwagon and locked down their accounts after realizing their drunken, topless keg stands from college are not ideal for prospective employers (or maybe it is). That didn’t stop the companies from demanding candidates turnover login information to their accounts – it’s even happened to people that were already employed as a condition of continued employment. Needless to say, this hasn’t sat well with … anyone. FaceBook has finally risen to the occasion and at least threatened to begin suing companies demanding illegitimate access to user accounts. One bill was already squashed in congress to make this illegal, but it was a rider on another bill. As such, the Social Networking Online Protection Act is being pushed again as an independent act.
Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:
- Making the Switch to Unadulterated Online Banking, by Brandon almost 6 years ago
- Google Blankets Hometown with Free WiFi, by Brandon almost 7 years ago
- Fueling the Mentos and Diet Coke Explosion , by tomtolman almost 7 years ago
- Is Google News Censoring Conservative Blogs?, by LordDilly almost 7 years ago


Print Friendly
Write an Article
Why not let them show their colors? by Occams
If an employer asked me for such a password, then I would be grateful for discovering at such an early stage that this was an outfit I would not like to work for.
If Congress makes it illegal to ask the question it will only be hleping to hide the poor character of employers from potential employees.
Second-hand experience by Brandon
A fried of mine told me this happened to her. During a job interview, the interviewer went to Facebook and asked her to sign in and leave the room. She did, and about ten minutes later he said she could come back in. I was floored – as was everyone else who heard the story. The audacity.
On the other hand, I don’t think the interviewer was going to steal her identity or search for pictures of her less than fully clothed. I’m sure he performed a number of routine searches to be sure she wasn’t a spy or a terrorist or whatever.
Violation of privacy, yes. Necessarily sinister, no.
So, in the end, I disagree with a law making that practice illegal. Hypothetically, even if someone wants to only hire people who would pose nude, that should be their prerogative.
Oh, wait…