Analyzing and Improving Employee Share Purchase Plan Profitability
Having just come out of my first complete Employee Share Purchase Plan (ESPP)1 “cycle,” I’m somewhat disappointed at how naive I was going in.2 I was so excitemented to buy into a very profitable, guaranteed investment, that I failed to analyze the steps in detail. Doing so would have helped me have more realistic expectations, as well as allowed me to maximize my profit. Hopefully this will help others in my position fifteen months ago make more informed investment decisions.3
My plan
At first glance, my company’s ESPP seemed almost too good to be true. The high-level process goes like this:
- Near the end of the preceding year, commit to participate and select an initial contribution amount ranging from 1%-25% of your income.
- Adjust your contribution level as desired throughout the year.
- Contributions cutoff when the total amount contributed reaches a set maximum (e.g., $6,827 in my case in 2008).
- The financial institution buys company stock with the contributed money at a 15% discount from the current share price or the share price at the beginning of the year, whichever is lower.
As far as I could tell, if I sold the stock right after it was purchase, I would walk away with at least a 15% return on my investment – greatly exceeding any guaranteed return investments (perhap all of the non-guaranteed ones, too). Sure, there could be some variation between the time the stock is purchased and the time my sale goes through, but it would likely be minor.
A good start
Everything proceeded according to plan through step 3. I enrolled, set my contribution level and adjusted it as needed – all through an easy online interface. I didn’t even have to worry about the maximum value, as my contributions were automatically suspended once I reached it.
The first wrinkle
Starting from the stock purchase, however, I began to notice wrinkles in the process – or in my understanding of the process, at least. A few days into the new year I went online to sell my stock and reap the 15% profit. Oddly, however, I saw there was still a good amount of money leftover in the ESPP fund (i.e., money that wasn’t used to buy stock). $2,377.20 – or almost 35% – to be exact.
Needless to say, I was disappointed. I didn’t want to make 15% on 65% of what I invested and 0% on the rest. That’s less than a 10% net return overall. Yes, it’s better than any other guaranteed investement I know of, but still.
I investigated despite my disenchantment and found the dollar amount isn’t the only investment limitation in my company’s ESPP; there’s also a share limit. In this case, the limit was 95 – and it apparently took only 65% of the dollar maximum buy 95 shares.
(As an aside, I have a difficult time understanding these limitations. Would something go horribly wrong if employees were allowed to invest (even ten times) more? And why the extra limitation (i.e., the share limit) when prices go down? Wouldn’t the company want more investment when prices are on the decline?)
Delays
Another thing I didn’t expect was how long the whole process would take. I intended to sell the stock (at full price) “as soon as” I bought it (at a discounted price), but it apprently takes a couple of days for the transactions to “clear.” When it was all said and done, six days passed from the time the company bought the shares to the time the sale finalized.
I must admit I contributed to that delay some. I entered a lower limit on my order, and it took the stock about a day to surpass the limit and trigger the sale. Share transactions weren’t the only delays, however. It also took about six days for the leftover money in my ESPP account to be transferred to my “core” (or individual) account – i.e., to work its way out of the system to where I could use it.
And then, when I thought everything was settled, my withdraw attempt was thwarted by a delay of “7-10 business days” to confirm my bank account details. (Granted, I could have set this up ahead of time. I also won’t have this delay in the future since the account link will already be setup.)
Taxes and fees
Of course, my company isn’t the only entity wishing to limit my profit; the financial agency and the government both want in on the action, too. Fidelity charged a fee to perform the stock share, and then the government took slices for federal income tax, medicare and social security:
| Fidelity sale fee | $10.95 |
| Federal Income Tax | $196.41 |
| Social Security Tax | $48.71 |
| Medicare Tax | $11.39 |
Calculating profit
Here’s one way at looking at the overall cash flow:
| Change | Balance | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| $6,827.00 | $6,827.00 | starting investment |
| ($4,449.80) | $2,377.20 | 95 share purchase |
| $5,224.97 | $7,602.17 | 95 share sale |
| ($10.95) | $7,591.22 | Fidelity fee for sale |
| ($196.41) | $7,394.81 | federal income tax |
| ($48.71) | $7,346.10 | social security tax |
| ($11.39) | $7,334.71 | medicare tax |
Subtracting off the initial investment leaves a $507.71 net profit, which corresponds to a ($507.71 / $6827 =) 7.4% net return – just under half of what I naively expected. Of course, some other investments would be charged at the same tax rates, so it’s worth knowing the return before taxes: ($764.22 / $6827 =) 11.2%.
Potential improvements
Even without changes in my company’s ESPP plan (or the country’s tax schedules), there are still some things I could do next time to increase my return.
Delay contributions
The shorter my money sits in the ESPP account before the stock purchase, the better. The regulations state I must contribute between 1% and 25% of my paycheck throughout the year in order to participate, but contributions can still be delayed within this rubric.
For example, if my paycheck is $5,000 each month and the maximum yearly ESPP contribution is $7,500, a “fully delayed” contribution schedule would be as follows:
| Month | Contribution % | Contribution $ | Total Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| January | 1% | $50 | $50 |
| February | 1% | $50 | $100 |
| March | 1% | $50 | $150 |
| April | 1% | $50 | $200 |
| May | 1% | $50 | $250 |
| June | 1% | $50 | $300 |
| July | 19% | $950 | $1,250 |
| August | 25% | $1,250 | $2,500 |
| September | 25% | $1,250 | $3,750 |
| October | 25% | $1,250 | $5,000 |
| November | 25% | $1,250 | $6,250 |
| December | 25% | $1,250 | $7,500 |
The schedule should always end up being a certain number of months at 1%, one month at an intermediate level, and then the remainder of the year at 25%. Of course, your salary could change mid-year, which would throw everything off. Also, if your company limit is high enough (or your salary low enough), you might pay 25% the whole time and not reach the maximum. On the flip side, if your company limit is low enough (or your salary high enough), you might reach the maximum without ever having to contribute 25% (or even above 1%).
Track stocks
Using the current share price and my investment balance, I can always calculate how many shares I could afford right then. If that number starts getting close to my limit, then it may be a good idea to drop my contribution rate back down to 1%. I might not reach the maximum contribution level, but if the money isn’t going to be used to buy stock, it’s better off somewhere else (where it will earn interest).
I have to be careful here, though, as it would be possible to paint myself into a corner – particularly if I was employing the delayed contribution schedule I described above. If the share price jumps high enough at the end of the year, I may not be able to get enough funds invested to buy a full 95 shares due to the 25% limit. It’s probably wise, then, to keep a buffer. For example, if the share limit was 100, the share price had been sitting at around $50 for nine months, and I already had contributed $6,000, I would feel comfortable dropping my contribution level down to the minimum. After all, the share price would have to jump more than $10 for me not to get the maximum investment – something greatly inconsistent with the price behavior so far that year.
Conclusions
Despite all of the unexpected twists and missed opportunities, the ESPP still turned out to be the best place to put my cash – given I was looking for a guaranteed return over one year. I didn’t see any CDs or high interest online savings accounts in 2008 that surpassed 4% APY,4 and the highest rate I was paying on an a debt was 5.00% on my mortgage. These couldn’t hold a candle to the 11.2% and 7.4% returns (respectively) on the ESPP.5
Notes
1 “Employee Stock Purchase Plan – ESPP.” Investopedia.com. Accessed January 2009 from http://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/espp.asp. My employer uses an alternate name, “Employee Share Purchase Plan.”
2 Hansen, Brandon. “Stock Purchase Plans vs Extra Mortgage Payments.” OmniNerd_, 28 August 2007. Accessed January 2009 from [http://www.omninerd.com/articles/Stock_Purchase_Plans_vs_Extra_Mortgage_PaymentsPayments]. Thanks to OmniNerd, my nativity is recorded for the world to see!
3 I’m not a professional consultant or anything of the sort. If you happen to lose money following my advice, I will sue you. So now we’re even.
4 If you’re looking for the best interest rate around, check out bankrate.com.
5 The savings account return is taxable, so it should be compared to the pre-tax ESPP return (11.2%). Avoiding mortgage interest, on the other hand, is not taxable, so it is compared to the after-tax ESPP return (7.4%). The mortgage interest comparison is even a little more complicated than that, as mortgage interest sometimes qualifies as a tax writeoff. Thus, although making extra payments on your home allows you to pay much less interest in the long run, you also pay less interest in the short term. Granted, the change is likely to be small, but it’s possible that slight writeoff reduction it could slip you into a higher tax bracket.
Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:
- Million Dollar Soldier, by VnutZ over 3 years ago
- Soddy's Law, by Occams about 4 years ago
- Has individualism gone too far?, by NomadSoul about 4 years ago
- Six Strategies for Creating a Personal Tax "Bailout", by Brandon over 4 years ago
This article was edited after publication by the author on 08 Jan 2009.
View changes.


Print Friendly
Write an Article
ESPP thoughts by Anonymous
Good article. Since ESPP are on the fringes of what I deal with for a living, four observations:
-C
More about tracking stocks by Brandon
Another point a friend at work brought up is that we already know one of the two share prices from which the discounted price will be calculated. Combined with the share limit for this year, we can predict exactly how much money we need to contribute to cover a full investment – if the share price stays the same or goes up.
So, the only time you’d need to track the share price is if it was below the price at the beginning of the year.
More abt selling stocks by Anonymous
Interesting article!!!
What uou have n’t considered here the time which is a big factor. The return can he higher if the sale price go further up (instead of 54.99).
One other thing :
If you hold securities for more than one year, any gains from the sale of these securities are called Long-term capital gains, and are taxed at 15% as opposed to the ordinary income rate of up to 35%. This will lower your profit futher than the calculated one (7.4%)!
In retrospect we don’t know whether the price will go below 15% discounted price!
Comments from an Equity Compensation Expert by Anonymous
First let me say that you are not the only person in the country to have issues like this at the end of 2008. The huge drop in company stock prices was unexpected and many companies did not have either the resources or the time to react quickly enough.
I help companies design and communicate ESPP and other equity compensation plans, so let me cover some of your points.
Plan Design/Features
1. Near the end of the preceding year, commit to participate and select an initial contribution amount ranging from 1%-25% of your income.
NOTE: Most companies limit the maximum contribution to either 10% or 15%, so you company is being very generous.
2. Adjust your contribution level as desired throughout the year.
NOTE: Since their is a charge to earning any time a participant increase their contributions, most companies ONLY allow employees to reduce contributions. The plans that allow for increases typically limit this to once per purchase period.
3. Contributions cutoff when the total amount contributed reaches a set maximum (e.g., $6,827 in my case in 2008).
NOTE: The company has created its own dolar limit in this case. Since these plans are mainly designed as a broad-based ownershjip vehicle lower limits than allowed by IRS rules are not that uncommon.
4. The financial institution buys company stock with the contributed money at a 15% discount from the current share price or the share price at the beginning of the year, whichever is lower.
NOTE: This type of discount is the most common for ESPPs. Where a small percentage of companies (less than 25% reduced their discount or did away with their ESPP following FAS 123R accounting rules in 2005, most have kept this more generous structure.
(As an aside, I have a difficult time understanding these limitations. Would something go horribly wrong if employees were allowed to invest (even ten times) more?
NOTE: Quite possible yes. 1) The accounting charge may be too large for the company to bear. 2) The shares approved by shareholders might run out far to soon. 3) The highest paid individuals in the company would likely purchase an inequitable portion of the available shares.
And why the extra limitation (i.e., the share limit) when prices go down? Wouldn’t the company want more investment when prices are on the decline?).
NOTE: This is to ensure that ESPPs do not run out of shares when prices are severly depressed. Since the approval of ESPP shares is often difficult are usually quite limited not having a limitation might have killed your entire plan during the last purchase period.
The company is not trying to limiot your profit as much as they are trying to ensure that you can continue to profit for an extended period of time.
Fidelity is a brokerage firm and as such, charges fees to stay in business.
The Government actually offers a unique income and tax situation with ESPPs conforming to IRC 423 (such as your company’s.) As long as you hold the shares for 2 years from the grant date and 1 year from the purchase (which ever is longer) you will have only a tiny portion of Ordinary Income (=to the spread at the time of grant) and NO Employment Income (FICA, Medicare) and nearly all of your gain will likely be taxed at the Long Term Capital Gains rate (currently 15%, rather than somewhere around 35%). If you count FICA and Medicare this can lower your taxes owed by more than 60%! Since you sold your shares as soon as practicable, you had Ordinary Income and all of the taxes associated with it.
Your 11.2 / 7.4% gain certianly beat the market during the period in question.
It is unlikely that your delayed contribution method would work over the long run. 1) As mentioned earlier, most companies are working to disallow the indiscriminate increase of contributions during the purchase period.
Things that may work in the future.
1) Ask the person in charge of your ESPP to inform you when your contributions relative to the stock price are getting you near to the maximum share limit. Stop all contributions when you get to this point and invest the remainder of your future potential contributions elsewhere.
2) track your companies stock price and withdraw from the plan and purhase stock on the open market if you feel the price mid-period is sginificantly lower than your discount would allow at the end of the purchase period.
3) Do not sell your stock immediately upon purchase. This exposes you to market risk (which can be partially managed by setting a limit order), but it does allow for a significant reduction in taxes due.
There are some great sites with information on ESPPs
www.fairmark.com
www.nceo.org
Best of luck,
Dan
I had read the fine details so I knew ...... by Anonymous
about the share limitation, and I knew that more than $2k would be refunded.
But I thought the tax would be charged only if I sell the stocks. I was charged the same tax (Federal Income Tax $196.41, Social Security Tax $48.71, Medicare Tax $11.39) through selling of 5 shares on 7th Jan. And the transaction said that the shares were sold “on my request”. When I called to find out, I was told that the 15% discount amounts to income which is taxable, even if I hold the stocks. So I have 90 stocks in my account.
I had my bank account setup, so I could have sold the stocks immediately, but I plan to hold them.
BTW, I didn’t know that the contribution would stop automatically once the maximum value is reached.
ESPP by Anonymous
One other point to note is that if the employee is on the insider list, and if the stock is particularly volatile, the purchased shares may be underwater when you they can sell them.
FIFO by Brandon
A friend/coworker came by today and told me about another potential complication when you don’t sell your shares right away: Fidelity’s “First In First Out” (FIFO) policy. This is how it played out:
What’s the difference? Well, the share price, of course. In my friend’s case, the share price was much higher at the beginning of 2008, so he took a loss on the sale. If the shares just purchased had been sold to pay taxes instead, he would have likely earned money on them (following the same method I explained in the article).
Why does Fidelity do this? Other than knowing they have the “First In First Out” policy, I couldn’t tell you.