8 Nerd-Its - +

After Veto Threat, Bush Presses House On Surveillance Bill

Newspaper a current event article by Mac (smcbride), published on 13 February 2008
tagged as government, privacy, telecommunications, and intelligence
other nerds have left 8 comments below

"The time for debate is over," announced President Bush after threatening last week to the House of Representatives with a veto to any surveillance bill that prevents intelligence agencies from doing their jobs. President Bush stepped up pressure on the House to pass new rules for monitoring terrorists communications in a measure that passed the Senate on Tuesday. President Bush said, "terrorists are planning new attacks on our country … that will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison."

The Surveillance Bill will give telecommunications companies retroactive immunity from privacy lawsuits so long as they cooperate with providing intelligence agencies the ability to eavesdrop on phone calls and e-mails between suspected terrorists. "We need the cooperation of telecommunications companies," Bush said. "If these companies are subjected to lawsuits costing billions of dollars, they won’t participate, they won’t help us."

Similarly tagged OmniNerd content:

Thread parent sort order:
Thread verbosity:
2 Nerd-Its - +
No need for change by Occams :: NR8

Interception of private telecommunications already requires a court order (warrant) from a judge.

Telecommunications carriers must obey a court order, and must refuse to do it without one.

No civil actions against carriers for doing this are possible if there is a court order.

This is already the law and there is no need to change it.
So what is Bush up to here?

OmniNerd Article Propagation

The Showcase

Nerd-Its   Nerd Trends   Last Ten  

  1. RE: We can do better. in U.S. Healthcare: the Best, the Worst, and the Irrelevant
  2. The world could end, any moment, any second... in NASA: THE WORLD WILL NOT END IN 2012
  3. RE: We can do better. in U.S. Healthcare: the Best, the Worst, and the Irrelevant
  4. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  5. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  6. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  7. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  8. RE: Sick care in U.S. Healthcare: the Best, the Worst, and the Irrelevant
  9. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you
  10. RE: Why wouldn't it be a religion? Yes, but .... in Scientology: We've had it with you

What is OmniNerd?

Omninerd_icon Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by nerds like you. Learn more.

Voting Booth

The Interstate Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution empowers Congress to regulate?

11 votes, 0 comments