Most Nerd-Its | Nerd Trends | Recent

  1. RE: It looks to me like... in Insulting Treatment?
  2. It looks to me like... in Insulting Treatment?
  3. Potential Media Manipulation in Insulting Treatment?
  4. Doesn't Matter Who The President Is in Insulting Treatment?
  5. RE: Bizarro World in Ten Silver Linings for Conservatives
  6. RE: I am just here for the party! in Do you vote on your own OmniNerd content?
  7. RE: Bizarro World in Ten Silver Linings for Conservatives
  8. RE: Prime the Pump in Do you vote on your own OmniNerd content?
  9. Prime the Pump in Do you vote on your own OmniNerd content?
  10. RE: IPv6 and NAT boxes in Naming and Overlay Architectures

What is OmniNerd?

Welcome! OmniNerd's content is generated by you, the reader. Through voting and moderation we strive to highlight the nerdiest of what's around and provide content that's a little more thought provoking than other sites.

Submit New Content

Voting Booth

Do you vote on your own OmniNerd content?

16 votes, 11 comments
3
Nerd-Its
+ -

Advice for a New Father

Layout

article by jmarkdavison on 03 September 2005, tagged as family

If you've got a Y chromosome and you're thinking about having a baby, then this article is for you. How do you handle a miscarriage? What if she gets mad at you? What stuff do you need to buy? If these questions have ever crossed your mind, rest easy. From getting pregnant to accessorizing your baby, Mark Davison presents a humorous and insightful look at being a new father.

Star This to Save in Your Profile Favorite
Thread parent sort order:
Highest Voted : Lowest Voted : Oldest : Newest
Thread verbosity:
Expand All : Minimize Replies to Comments

As an MD I should inform all the father-to-be about this study: Father's Age Linked to Risk of Schizophrenia. It's not good to became father too early (because of deficiency of social maturity), but postponing it may also be hazardous. An accumulation of mutations in reproductive cells concerns both males and females, but in general only age of females is mentioned as a risk factor for different congenital defects (e.g. Down syndrome).

Mark, great article. I want to provide some information about digital video since I just got married and prior to the big day my wife and I decided to buy both a camera and computer for video editing and DVD creation.

I learned two things: First, ordinary PCs are not up to speed with digital video: you'll get much better quality attaching your camcorder to the VCR and recording to a tape than you will making a DVD on your computer.

I disagree, and here's why:

1. You're going to lose quality in the transfer and in the media. The end result is a non-precise analog video created from the clean digital source. If this is going to be your method, you may as well by a VHS camcorder from a store that still carries them.

2. Any new PC today with at least 512 MB or RAM should be capable of handling digital video for home use. If you start getting into the professional-grade stuff, then you're going to need a bigger system, but for home video, you don't.

3. VHS is a dying thing. It's like making a cassette tape for someone... chances are they won't be able to play it.

4. The quality is in the camera. The fact that it's digital means that 1's and 0's get passed, not analog signals. If the camera is recording low quality images, the computer isn't going to help it out. Look for cameras with CCDs, usually 1 per your three main digital colors: Red, Green, and Blue. These will produce amazingly sharp images. I use a Panasonic PV-GS150 and it is awesome.

...the list goes on with minor things, but I think I hit the little ones. The bottom line is that I wouldn't compromise.

Second, PCs come with rudimentary video-editing software. If you really want to make DVDs, be prepared to shell out $50-$100 for a decent program.

This is true for PCs. A friend of mine just got Pinnacle which is similar to what I use and it was $90. I personally use an Apple PowerMac with iMovie and iDVD. Both programs are very high quality and come installed on new computers as a part of the iLife software package, which includes photo and sound editing software in addition to video editing software. We used this to make a 50 minute video full of clips from the wedding festivities. With the menu features of DVD, it's much nicer than having a tape. Some things to consider:

1. Use the DV (digital video) port on your camera to connect to your computer via FireWire. With the digital connection, the computer can take control of your camera and import your video as clips, with each clip beginning at the places you stopped/started recording. After that, it's all drag and drop to make your video.

2. With digital its very easy to add music and trim scenes. Let's face it, some of our home video is just boring. But if you take a few seconds from several boring clips and add music, it can become quite entertaining.

3. You have far more options for digital video today than you do for VHS. If you don't already have the VHS equipment, don't spend the money on it. Put your money into a new camera and computer.

4. Price. While shopping, I found that for a decent video camera, you'll need to spend around $500. This will get you a high megapixel cound and usually 3 "CCD"s, or color processors. They will output very high quality digital images and stereo sound. For the computer, I got a PowerMac G5 with dual 2Ghz processors for $1400 used. This thing has power to spare. But the nice thing is that you don't have to spend that much. For $600, you should easily be able to find a PC beefy enough to handle digital video.

5. Hard Drive. All of the other components of your computer will just make digital editing faster. But you will need a big hard drive to handle your edits. For my hour-long video, my computer is using 25 GB to store it on the disk (the movie edit file that is, the actual disk image is 2.95 GB). There are settings you can use to lower this, but it limits your options. If nothing else, go big on your hard drive. Allocate room for nothing but video editing. My disk is 250 GB and it serves all of my needs.

...so, in conclusion, I think DV is the way to go. This isn't necessarily stated as a complete contradiction to Mark's conclusion either. There are definitely instances where VHS may actually suit you better. But if you've got the money or the existing system, and don't need to produce VHS, I'd say DV all the way. If you're not a "power-user" when it comes to computers and you don't do much other than email and surf AND you're looking for a new one, give the Apples a look. The pre-installed video software package is nicer than most anything you'll pay for off-the-shelf on a PC and it comes with their new computers. Or if you've got an Apple, drop the $79 and grab iLife. If you go PC, you're going to have to buy the software separate to get anything decent. Pinnacle is the nicest I've seen, but I'm sure there are others.

Happy editing!

0 Nerd-Its - +
Travel Cribs by Travis :: NR4

Mark,

I enjoyed your informative and humorous article. My wife and I had our baby boy nine months ago and currently in the transition of school to career stage of our lives. We are moving to the UK to work for at least a year and we are not planning to ship everything over (crib, and other bulky baby gear). The Pogy travel crib sounded every intriguing. Do you recommend this solely for camping/traveling circumstances or would you extend the intended uses as a temporary sleeping arrangement? Any other suggestions on baby gear for international travel use are welcome.

0 Nerd-Its - +
C-Section thoughts by Valerie :: NR5

Great article, Mark. I actually just recommended it to a friend who recently found out that she and her husband are expecting. Congratulations on the birth of your son!

A few quick comments: You said, regarding C-sections, "It saves Mom a lot of pain and you can schedule your kids' birthdays from then on."

C-Sections are usually performed using spinal anesthesia, so the mothers can feel nothing below the ribs during the procedure. So yes, in a sense it does save the mom some pain in the short term. However, healing from C-sections can be prolonged, as the muscular disruption is substantial. The skin and fascial healing also takes time and is rather painful. Women who deliver vaginally are usually up and about within one or two days. So, as far as pain relief is concerned, C-section is not the painless choice.

Also, the old adage of "Once a C-section, always a C-section" isn't true anymore. The research has shown that for many women who have had a C-section in the past, vaginal delivery is possible. VBAC (vaginal birth after Cesarean) provides women the opportunity to deliver non-surgically in hospitals with acute care professionals available, in case of complications. Although there are some increased risks compared to women delivering vaginally with no prior C-section, many women opt to attempt vaginal delivery and most are successful.

VBACs are patient, doctor, and facility dependent. There are many variables to consider, including type of previous c-section, indication for the procedure, size of baby, and fetal position (presentation). The facility has to be capable of handling c-sections (no VBACs at home) with fully equipped ORs, anesthesia, and other acute care staff available. But if all the ducks are in order, why not try for VBAC? What is there to lose anyway? A failed VBAC usually just means a trip to the OR for a C-section. A sucessful VBAC means decreased healing time, more involvement in the delivery, less blood loss, lower infection risk, and an overall safer delivery for mother and baby.